Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,352 Year: 3,609/9,624 Month: 480/974 Week: 93/276 Day: 21/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Quantum physics: Copenhagen vs decoherence interpretations
Son Goku
Inactive Member


Message 57 of 57 (483262)
09-21-2008 7:54 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by Straggler
09-16-2008 6:34 PM


Re: Freewill
Straggler writes:
That sounds intriguing. What recent developments have occurred that make this more possible/reliable? Are you talking technological, mathematical, conceptual....??
All three. The fields of quantum computation, quantum statistical mechanics and quantum measurement theory have provided the main advancements.
Contrary to popular belief, it is not the size of an object which determines if it is classical or not, but rather how "thermal" it is. Thermal meaning how much it interacts with its surroundings. Large objects are always interacting and hence are rarely quantum in nature. To help people in seeing this, one may view an interaction as a measurement. Big objects are always being measured and are thus "forced" by measurement to be in a definite state.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Straggler, posted 09-16-2008 6:34 PM Straggler has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024