Flow Chart from DNA to Amino Acid

Hello,
I just want to post a flow chart that I did based on my limited research from DNA to Protein to possibility of life. My questions are:
1) How can I post the flow-chart if I'm allowed?
2) Would members be kind enough to make corrections thereto?
3) Can I accompany the flow chart with just 6 or so questions without me replying. ( I just want to know what's on the mind of some members).

Here's is the two-page flow chart. Thanks, Razd & Asqara. Edited by Doubting Too, : not workingEdited by Doubting Too, : No reason given.Edited by Doubting Too, : No reason given.Edited by Doubting Too, : No reason given.

Hi A,
Please check if it works now.DT

Hi Mr J,
I think I've followed your format--based on peek. Like this?

I hope you are able to access the flow chart ( #3 message). And, I hope that my flow chart explains the basic transformation from DNA to protein to life. If not, please correct.My related questions both to IDs and believers in evolution are:1. DNA is called the book of life. Can anyone make a book--that makes sense--by just throwing letters randomly?2. Genetic codes and information are embedded in DNA. Is not intelligence required to decode and process information?3. The cell has a "complex copying" machine that replicates DNA's to RNAs. Which is more reasonable to believe that intelligence was needed to make that copying machine, or was it random chance that did it?4. The actual process from DNA to protein to life is a million times more complicated than this flowchart. As this flow chart required intelligence (though limited) to make, so should the more complex process require intelligence. Agree / Disagree? Please give reason.5. What did Miller's failed experiment in 1953 prove?
a) that it requires blind chance to produce "left handed" amino acids--the building block of life? Or, did it prove that the chance of life coming to existence by mere chance is mathematically impossible?6. Darwinian evolution--as taught in school--says that all living things came to existence because of unguided natural processes. On the other hand, intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not by undirected processes such as natural selection. Considering the above flowchart--which hopefully simplified the picture--which is more reasonable to believe?Edited by Doubting Too, : clarity

Thanks, Kureso and Wounded king. I am waiting for other answers specially from those who believe in ID.Edited by Doubting Too, : No reason given.

Kuresu,
Please explain to me the following. I'm not familiar with them.I'm just a kid, you know.
a) ToE
b)Dumbski's information theory.thanks,
DT

Hi Wounded King,
I'm just a kid doing research. I truly appreciate your input. I got this info from nobelprize.org. It says "DNA carries the genetic info of a cell and consists of a thousands genes". Is this wrong info?Over-simplification? That info I got from Nobelprize.org. Sorry, if the thread is bad. I'm doing research. Could you suggest an improvement on the flow-chart that could be understood by kids like me?

Razd,
Thanks for your valuable input to my research:
Just a few question, if you won't mind. I've read from another source that yes, they found left handed amino acids even in meteorites. But, one possible explanation is these came from earth during some of its "cataclysmic" events--e.g. violent eruption of earthly volcanos--that sent these stuff to the atmosphere and stuck to these meteorites. Any other plausible explanation re. left handed amino acid? How do I tell my teacher that he is teaching us garbage about evolution?