The recent research on sedimentology and stratigraphy?
Watch how fast factual repeatable experiments are dismissed by the scientific community when the results conflict with accepted theories, and how they are dismissed. Note that trying to repeat them is not being mentioned as a means of refuting them.
That is cherry picking as far as I can tell.
Berthault's experiments are perfectly OK. The problem is, again, in the application. They involve conditions that
could occur in nature, but practically never do. Take, just for one example close to my house, the redbeds in the Palo Duro Canyon near Amarillo, Texas. They are hundreds of feet thick and consist of thin little leaves of red sandstone or siltstone with white layers of crystalline gypsum interbedded all through them. Thousands of layers.
Formations that look just like them are forming now, between Anglagard's home and Midland, Texas at a place called Red Lake. It's a lake of sorts maybe one month out of the year in wet years, and otherwise a big flat pan. When it rains hard, reddish sand and silt wash into the pan with the rainwater and then settle out. Then the water evaporates in the sun, and the gypsum and other salts it carries crystallize on top of the silt. The cycle repeats year after year - though the dirtbikers and four-wheelers disturb it a lot lately.
It looks just like those redbeds. And Berthault's experiments can't make something similar, what with the delicacy and grown-in-place nature of the gypsum crystals.
And that's only one of hundreds of formations Berthault can't make. The White Cliffs of Dover come to mind - Thomas Huxley showed that about 140 years ago.
"The wretched world lies now under the tyranny of foolishness; things are believed by Christians of such absurdity as no one ever could aforetime induce the heathen to believe." - Agobard of Lyons,
ca. 830 AD