Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,488 Year: 3,745/9,624 Month: 616/974 Week: 229/276 Day: 5/64 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Board Administration ⇒ Proposed New Topics ⇒

Is it possible to identify the parts of a system objectively?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is it possible to identify the parts of a system objectively?
Admin
Director
Posts: 13023
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.0

Normal Thread Display
Message 2 of 7 (486128)
10-16-2008 8:26 AM 		Reply to: Message 1 by BVZ
10-16-2008 4:35 AM

Please fix spelling/grammar errors:
​
BVZ writes:
​
...thier...
​
effect (should be affect in a couple places)
​
Weather => Whether
​
depents => depends
​
Also, Bio-MolecularTony has proposed a very similar thread, so I'll only be promoting one. Would you prefer to have Tony reply to your opening post, or would you rather use your content here to reply to his? If you have no preference then I'll just promote the one that is more specific and scientific.
​
--Percy
EvC Forum Director
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by BVZ, posted 10-16-2008 4:35 AM BVZ has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by BVZ, posted 10-16-2008 8:54 AM Admin has replied
Admin
Director
Posts: 13023
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.0

Normal Thread Display
Message 4 of 7 (486134)
10-16-2008 9:23 AM 		Reply to: Message 3 by BVZ
10-16-2008 8:54 AM

BVZ writes:
​
Thank you for pointing out the errors. English is not my first language, so errors are bound to creep in.
​
Firefox and Chrome both have built-in spellcheckers, and Google Toolbar includes one for Internet explorer.
​
The only proposed thread by Tony I could find is this one:
​
http://EvC Forum: (ID) Grading the Intellect from the (non-natural) Design -->EvC Forum: (ID) Grading the Intellect from the (non-natural) Design
​
Assuming this is the thread you are referring to, I don't see any resemblance really. Please point me to the thread you are referring to, and I will check it out to see if it brings up the same issue.
​
You're both suggesting ways in which design can be measured. Tony proposes using human design capabilities as the measuring stick, while you solicit suggestions for a reliable and reproducible method capable of reducing designs to constituent parts. In other words, Tony's thread proposal satisfies your request.
​
So I can promote your thread proposal and Tony can reply to you, or we can do the reverse. Do you have a preference?
​
--Percy
EvC Forum Director
This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by BVZ, posted 10-16-2008 8:54 AM BVZ has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by BVZ, posted 10-17-2008 1:55 AM Admin has replied
Admin
Director
Posts: 13023
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.0

Normal Thread Display
Message 6 of 7 (486220)
10-17-2008 6:04 AM 		Reply to: Message 5 by BVZ
10-17-2008 1:55 AM

Those are good points, plus Tony hasn't responded to my request to fix spelling and grammar, so I'm going to promote your thread.
​
--Percy
EvC Forum Director
This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by BVZ, posted 10-17-2008 1:55 AM BVZ has not replied
Admin
Director
Posts: 13023
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.0

Normal Thread Display
Message 7 of 7 (486223)
10-17-2008 6:04 AM

Thread copied to the Is it possible to identify the parts of a system objectively? thread in the Intelligent Design forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024