Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 40/46 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Buz's refutation of all radiometric dating methods
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2133 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 259 of 269 (486146)
10-16-2008 11:53 AM
Reply to: Message 258 by Raedril Delvon
10-16-2008 11:36 AM


Re: Radiometric dating.
Your post is a long train-of-thought mish-mash that is very difficult to read.
Please separate your posts into paragraphs in the future.
Also, most of your points have long since been refuted. Rather than deal with them again, let me point you to a website that has dealt with these issues so often that they have been numbered for convenience.
Take a look at the arguments on this site, then get back to us:
Index to Creationist Claims: An Index to Creationist Claims

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 258 by Raedril Delvon, posted 10-16-2008 11:36 AM Raedril Delvon has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024