Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 80 (8897 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 03-18-2019 10:02 PM
134 online now:
Meddle, Tanypteryx (2 members, 132 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WookieeB
Post Volume:
Total: 848,446 Year: 3,483/19,786 Month: 478/1,087 Week: 68/212 Day: 29/39 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev1
...
45678
9
Author Topic:   the rules in science
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10284
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 121 of 123 (486441)
10-20-2008 4:13 PM
Reply to: Message 120 by Brad McFall
10-20-2008 3:58 PM


Re: Form
......the forms of life

Type the phrase "forms of life" into the average search engine and I think you might get some insight into the more common usage of the term.

I fear that you often see philosophical complexity where the mundane is the actual reality.

Looking for unicorns in a field full of donkeys.......

Edited by Straggler, : Fix quote


This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by Brad McFall, posted 10-20-2008 3:58 PM Brad McFall has not yet responded

  
Syamsu 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3663 days)
Posts: 1914
From: amsterdam
Joined: 05-19-2002


Message 122 of 123 (487254)
10-29-2008 5:51 AM
Reply to: Message 117 by Modulous
10-20-2008 12:36 PM


Re: Subjective interpretations
Let's all keep in the back of our minds that it is just about 10 years ago that a science paper appeared in which an idea was raised about a scientific theory of free will. There still isn't any science paper to point to which establishes it is real as a demonstrated fact. So all these science fans do not comprehend freedom, so they also don't understand the relationship between morality and freedom.

Why don't you all just realize your ignorance about the subject, and revert to the tried and tested ways, as explained in posts before. For many years scientists have been saying as a principle matter they can't answer "why" questions, only "how". That rule should just continue, and the offenders be confronted as pseudoscientists.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by Modulous, posted 10-20-2008 12:36 PM Modulous has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by AdminNosy, posted 10-29-2008 9:10 AM Syamsu has not yet responded

    
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 123 of 123 (487259)
10-29-2008 9:10 AM
Reply to: Message 122 by Syamsu
10-29-2008 5:51 AM


Syamsu
Syamsu, please do not post in this thread again.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by Syamsu, posted 10-29-2008 5:51 AM Syamsu has not yet responded

  
Prev1
...
45678
9
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019