Can science refute the "god hypothesis" beyond all reasonable doubt?

I believe the people who organized these religions were not stupid or believers themselves. They knew all to well what a society that lacked fear would be like...uncontrolable. They understood quite well the human psyche and knew that if people thought that they would be punished for eternity, then they would follow the rules, even when no one was watching. To steal a line from Dawkins, 'It's the big survalence camera in the sky'. The method works. It works so well that even scientist like yourself, who understand nature, still fear the reprocussions of simply stating your opinion because you've been programmed to fear the 'watchdog in the sky'.

faith based theories

Here a faith based theory is simply a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural by its very nature of not yet being concluded.

Agreed, as I have already stated this numerous times. If it is not falsifiable, logically, it cannot be wholly refuted.
The assertion that a faith based method is false only because it has not been proven true fits squarely within the argumentum ad ignorantiam.

you stated
I thank you for conceding to this end.In conclusion, science cannot refute the "god hypothesis" beyond all reasonable doubt. As faith is the evidence for things unseen, all science need do in order to refute the "god hypothesis" beyond all reasonable doubt is disprove faith and testably demonstrate that faith invariably leads to incorrect conclusions. We all know that this cannot be done.Any assertion that a faith based method is false only because it has not been proven true fits squarely within the argumentum ad ignorantiam. And so, faith based assertions remain as hypothesis' that - without conclusion and henceforth, any testability - cannot be wholly refuted beyond all reason or logic.