Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,877 Year: 4,134/9,624 Month: 1,005/974 Week: 332/286 Day: 53/40 Hour: 4/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Anything Divine in the Bible?
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3129 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 14 of 406 (489590)
11-28-2008 11:49 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by Peg
11-28-2008 1:31 AM


Mosaic Law is derived from ancient Babylonnian and Sumerian Codes of Law
read the mosaic law and you'll see that human rights and respect/care for the individual is at the forefront and yes, treating anyone like cattle was condemned
Can you back that up from scripture from the Pentateuch? Israelites were commanded to treat their fellow Israelites kindly but this was not expected for their foreign slaves.
How about this one:
Exodus 21:20-21 NASB writes:
20 If a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod and he dies at his hand, he shall be punished.
21 If, however, he survives a day or two, no vengeance shall be taken; for he is his property.
violence in all its forms is condemned, even against animals
even the human rights of slaves are upheld in that every 7 years they were to be set free. Exodus 21.2 “In case you should buy a Hebrew slave, he will be a slave six years, but in the seventh he will go out as one set free without charge.
This only applies to Israelites who become indentured servants to other Israelites. This does not apply to non-Hebrew slaves as seen here:
Leviticus 25:39-46 NASB writes:
39 If a countryman of yours becomes so poor with regard to you that he sells himself to you, you shall not subject him to a slave's service.
40 He shall be with you as a hired man, as if he were a sojourner; he shall serve with you until the year of jubilee.
41 He shall then go out from you, he and his sons with him, and shall go back to his family, that he may return to the property of his forefathers.
42 For they are My servants whom I brought out from the land of Egypt; they are not to be sold in a slave sale.
43 You shall not rule over him with severity, but are to revere your God.
44 As for your male and female slaves whom you may have--you may acquire male and female slaves from the pagan nations that are around you.
45 Then, too, it is out of the sons of the sojourners who live as aliens among you that you may gain acquisition, and out of their families who are with you, whom they will have produced in your land; they also may become your possession.
46 You may even bequeath them to your sons after you, to receive as a possession; you can use them as permanent slaves. (AC)But in respect to your countrymen, the sons of Israel, you shall not rule with severity over one another.
the mosaic law is an insight into the mind of God
Does that mean that God also wrote the Code of Hammurabi. Scholars believe Hammurabi to be the first king of the Babylonian Empire and his reign is accurately dated to the 17th century BC. The stories of Moses life date to to the 14th and 13th century BC at the latest.
Here are some eerily familiar slavery laws present in Hammurabi's Code of Laws:
Code of Hammurabi writes:
If a man has caught either a male or female runaway slave in the open field and has brought him back to his owner, the owner of the slave shall give him two shekels of silver.
If such a slave will not name his owner, his captor shall bring him to the palace, where he shall be examined as to his past and returned to his owner.
If a man's wife, living in her husband's house, has persisted in going out, has acted the fool, has wasted her house, has belittled her husband, he shall prosecute her. If her husband has said, "I divorce her," she shall go her way; he shall give her nothing as her price of divorce. If her husband has said, "I will not divorce her," he may take another woman to wife; the wife shall live as a slave in her husband's house.
If a slave of anyone has smitten the privates of a free-born man, his ear shall be cut off.
If a surgeon has operated with the bronze lancet on a patrician for a serious injury, and has cured him, or has removed with a bronze lancet a cataract for a patrician, and has cured his eye, he shall take ten shekels of silver.
If it be a man's slave, the owner of the slave shall give two shekels of silver to the surgeon.
If the surgeon has treated a serious injury of a plebeian's slave, with the bronze lancet, and has caused his death, he shall render slave for slave.
If he has removed a cataract with the bronze lancet, and made the slave lose his eye, he shall pay half his value.
If a man, in a foreign land, has bought a male, or female, slave of another, and if when he has come home the owner of the male or female slave has recognized his slave, and if the slave be a native of the land, he shall grant him liberty without money.
If the slave was a native of another country, the buyer shall declare on oath the amount of money he paid, and the owner of the slave shall repay the merchant what he paid and keep his slave.
Compare to the Mosaic Law:
Exodus 21:20-21 writes:
20 If a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod and he dies at his hand, he shall be punished.
21 If, however, he survives a day or two, no vengeance shall be taken; for he is his property.
Exodus 21:26-27 writes:
26 If a man strikes the eye of his male or female slave, and destroys it, he shall let him go free on account of his eye.
27 And if he knocks out a tooth of his male or female slave, he shall let him go free on account of his tooth.
Do you really see any difference here? Both slaves are treated like property i.e. cattle and thus have monetary value. There is no difference between your Mosaic law and Babylonian law. They both have the same "eye for an eye" type of jurisprudence. They are one in the same. And because Moses came later than Hammurabi, Mosaic law IS derived from ancient Babylonian and Sumerian laws.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Peg, posted 11-28-2008 1:31 AM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Peg, posted 11-28-2008 5:02 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3129 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 16 of 406 (489656)
11-28-2008 10:41 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Peg
11-28-2008 5:02 PM


Re: Mosaic Law is derived from ancient Babylonnian and Sumerian Codes of Law
Hammurabi’s code has notable differences to the mosaic law. It does not set out principles like the mosaic law for instance, opting for straight out rules and punishments. There existed in Hammurabi’s code a “sympathetic” punishment. One of the rules states: “If [a builder] has caused the son of the owner of the house to die [because the house is faulty and collapses], one shall put to death the son of that builder.” God’s law through Moses, to the contrary, stated: “Fathers should not be put to death on account of children, and children should not be put to death on account of fathers.” (De 24:16)
These scriptures seems to contratadict your premise:
Exodus 21:29-31 writes:
28 If an ox gores a man or a woman to death, the ox shall surely be stoned and its flesh shall not be eaten; but the owner of the ox shall go unpunished.
29 If, however, an ox was previously in the habit of goring and its owner has been warned, yet he does not confine it and it kills a man or a woman, the ox shall be stoned and its owner also shall be put to death.
30 If a ransom is demanded of him, then he shall give for the redemption of his life whatever is demanded of him.
31 Whether it gores a son or a daughter, it shall be done to him according to the same rule.
Exodus 34:6-7 writes:
6 Then the LORD passed by in front of him and proclaimed, "The LORD, the LORD God, compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in lovingkindness and truth;
7 who keeps lovingkindness for thousands, who forgives iniquity, transgression and sin; yet He will by no means leave the guilty unpunished, VISITING THE INIQUITY OF FATHERS ON THE CHILDREN AND ON THE GRANDCHILDREN TO THE THIRD AND FOURTH GENERATIONS.
However, this seems to be a minor difference between the two. Both advocate an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth type of jurispudence. It makes sense that the Hebrew law derived from the older Sumerian laws would build on them and modify them. Hebrew law still advocates treating women, children, servents and slaves as property not much different than cattle as shown here:
Exodus 21:20-22 writes:
20 If a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod and he dies at his hand, he shall be punished.
21 If, however, he survives a day or two, no vengeance shall be taken; for he is his property.
22 If men struggle with each other and strike a woman with child so that she gives birth prematurely, yet there is no injury, he shall surely be fined as the woman's husband may demand of him, and he shall pay as the judges decide.
also
Exodus 21:7 writes:
7 If a man sells his daughter as a female slave, she is not to go free as the male slaves do.
Why is it so difficult to see how Mosaic law derived from the of ancient Sumerian laws passed down from generation to generation from the time Abraham left Ur of the Chaldeas i.e. Sumeria.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Peg, posted 11-28-2008 5:02 PM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Peg, posted 11-30-2008 4:44 AM DevilsAdvocate has replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3129 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 17 of 406 (489695)
11-29-2008 10:28 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by Peg
11-28-2008 5:02 PM


Re: Mosaic Law is derived from ancient Babylonnian and Sumerian Codes of Law
Peg writes:
Hammurabi’s code has notable differences to the mosaic law. It does not set out principles like the mosaic law for instance, opting for straight out rules and punishments. There existed in Hammurabi’s code a “sympathetic” punishment. One of the rules states: “If [a builder] has caused the son of the owner of the house to die [because the house is faulty and collapses], one shall put to death the son of that builder.” God’s law through Moses, to the contrary, stated: “Fathers should not be put to death on account of children, and children should not be put to death on account of fathers.” (De 24:16)
Here are some more scripture that underminds your premise. Yaweh deliberately killed the child of David as a result of David's actions as seen here:
II Samuel 12:9-14 writes:
9 Why have you despised the word of the LORD by doing evil in His sight? You have struck down Uriah the Hittite with the sword, have taken his wife to be your wife, and have killed him with the sword of the sons of Ammon.
10 Now therefore, the sword shall never depart from your house, because you have despised Me and have taken the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be your wife.
11 Thus says the LORD, 'Behold, I will raise up evil against you from your own household; I will even take your wives before your eyes and give them to your companion, and he will lie with your wives in broad daylight.
12 Indeed you did it secretly, but I will do this thing before all Israel, and under the sun.'"
13 Then David said to Nathan, "I have sinned against the LORD " And Nathan said to David, "The LORD also has taken away your sin; you shall not die.
14 However, because by this deed you have given occasion to the enemies of the LORD to blaspheme, the child also that is born to you shall surely die."
18 Then it happened on the seventh day that the child died. And the servants of David were afraid to tell him that the child was dead, for they said, "Behold, while the child was still alive, we spoke to him and he did not listen to our voice. How then can we tell him that the child is dead, since he might do himself harm!"
19 But when David saw that his servants were whispering together, David perceived that the child was dead; so David said to his servants, "Is the child dead?" And they said, "He is dead."
So Yahweh (God) according to your Bible does practice "sympathetic" punishment and in fact caused the child to suffer for 7 days before killing him. God enacted infantcide.
How about God killing all the Egyptian firstborn including infants and small children (and God hardened Pharoes heart)? Wiping out the Amalikites including infants and small children.
I Samuel 15:3 writes:
3 Now go and strike Amalek and utterly destroy all that he has, and do not spare him; but put to death both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.'"
also
Hosea 13:16 writes:
16 The people of Samaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their God. They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their pregnant women ripped open.
Ezekiel 9:4-6 writes:
Go throughout the city of Jerusalem and put a mark on the foreheads of those who grieve and lament over all the detestable things that are done in it." As I listened, he said to the others, "Follow him through the city and kill, without showing pity or compassion. Slaughter old men, young men and maidens, women and children, but do not touch anyone who has the mark.
Isaiah 14:20-21 writes:
The offspring of the wicked will never be mentioned again. Prepare a place to slaughter his sons for the sins of their forefathers; they are not to rise to inherit the land and cover the earth with their cities.
and finally
Exodus 20:5-6 writes:
You shall not bow down to them [other gods] or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Peg, posted 11-28-2008 5:02 PM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Peg, posted 11-30-2008 5:04 AM DevilsAdvocate has replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3129 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 21 of 406 (489883)
11-30-2008 4:18 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Peg
11-30-2008 4:44 AM


Re: Mosaic Law is derived from ancient Babylonnian and Sumerian Codes of Law
moses didnt live in Babylon, nor did he ever live there... he was born and bred in egypt and then spent 40 years in the desert regions of Midian before returning to Egypt again to free the hebrews from slavery
You are right, Moses never lived in Babylon. However, Abraham, Moses ancestor, did originate from Ur of the Chaldees, a city-state in Old Babylonia. Thus the stories of Genesis would most certainly have been passed down from generation to generation (being altered along the way) to the time of Moses. From tradition, Moses is assumed to have penned these oral transmitted traditions into what we now know as the Torah. It is not a far stretch to see how Abraham took many of his Babylonian religious beliefs with him i.e. the Biblical Flood=Epic of Gilgamesh, etc. We can also see how the Israelites being enslaved in Egypt could have picked up their monotheist beliefs from the Egyptians (i.e. Pharaoh Akhenaten 1364-1347 B.C. support of the monotheist cult of the sun god Ra) and have backfilled the Genesis stories to match this monotheist belief.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Peg, posted 11-30-2008 4:44 AM Peg has not replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3129 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 22 of 406 (489884)
11-30-2008 4:24 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Peg
11-30-2008 4:44 AM


Re: Mosaic Law is derived from ancient Babylonnian and Sumerian Codes of Law
the miracles Moses was able to perform where given him by the Creator, whom also inspired and directed his writings including the Mosaic laws
hence, because of these facts, its most illogical to assume that he took the laws from the babylonians
These are not facts, these are ancient writings from an unknown author. I could write that I am Joan of Arc reincarnated, that does not mean it is true. Don't confuse religious belief with facts or credible evidence. They are not synonomous.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Peg, posted 11-30-2008 4:44 AM Peg has not replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3129 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 23 of 406 (489885)
11-30-2008 4:30 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Peg
11-30-2008 5:04 AM


Re: Mosaic Law is derived from ancient Babylonnian and Sumerian Codes of Law
Peg writes:
the scriptures dont really say that God killed the child. David had lived for years with Gods protection...God saved him from hunger and near death experiences on many occasions. But at this time in Davids life he wasnt really acting as he should. He killed a good man to hide his adulterous affair with the mans wife and because of this God removed his protection from David and yes, the child died not because God killed it, but because it had no divine protection.
This is pure speculation. Bend and twist the scripture to however you want to interpret it.
in those other scriptures you quote, its not really fair to condemn God for fighting against his enemies or killing them. He knew the circumstances, we may not.
You may recall the account in Jonah about his visit to the Ninevite city. That city had been condemned to death and God had sent Jonah in to tell them in advance...when the whole city pleaded for mercy, God gave it to them and turn away from destroying them.
It makes no difference to me how you want to interpret this as I do not believe that a. god exists and b. the bible is the inerent word of god. However, to any non-christian these words are pretty indicative of a malevolent and evil god who kills innocent children and babies as well as a host of other attrocities. Not much different than the Babylonian gods in my opinion.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Peg, posted 11-30-2008 5:04 AM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by bluescat48, posted 11-30-2008 5:28 PM DevilsAdvocate has not replied
 Message 27 by Peg, posted 11-30-2008 10:49 PM DevilsAdvocate has not replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3129 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 38 of 406 (489979)
12-01-2008 5:59 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by Peg
12-01-2008 1:40 AM


Re: read again
some people back then obviously chose to be slaves, so it must not have been as bad as it seems... You are talking like slavery was torture when quite obviously it wasnt.
The only case this applied for the Israelites is when some of their own people became slave i.e. indentured servents for other Israelites such as when misfortune fell upon them or they had no property i.e. no money. This was practiced in other cultures of that day as well.
In the case of foreign slaves the Israelites could do anything they wanted with them. Beat them senseless, give women slaves to their sons to rape, etc. Being a slave in some cases for these foreigners was probably worse than death (and I am sure many probably took their own lives). Yes their were probably slave masters who treated their slaves better than other ones, just as there were in later Greek and Roman cultures. However they had the God given right to beat their slaves senseless to make them work.
Slavery is slavery however you want to see it in your rose colored Christian glasses. It is a deplorable and horrible act. And if you try to justify it than I don't see you much better than the KKK or skinheads promoting hate crimes.
Thank goodness we have passed that point in our history (though we are not all out of the woods yet). Civil rights have been legislated and enforced, apartheid is gone in South Africa, human slave trade is diminishing (unfortunately the sex slave trade still covertly exists) etc. It is only through collective policing of ourselves that we can attain true equality of all humanity.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Peg, posted 12-01-2008 1:40 AM Peg has not replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3129 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 46 of 406 (490010)
12-01-2008 3:19 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Peg
12-01-2008 1:40 AM


Re: read again
some people back then obviously chose to be slaves, so it must not have been as bad as it seems... You are talking like slavery was torture when quite obviously it wasnt.
ROTFL. Oooh, pick me I want to be a slave! Are you fkg kidding me? You think people actually wanted to be slaves! Why don't you go tell an African American that his ancestors wanted to be slaves and it wasn't all that bad. Why, I can't see what all the fuss of the Civil War was over?
I have a homework assignment:
1. Read Roots by Alex Haley, also watch the series
2. Here is another good read "American Slavery: 1619-1877"
3. Watch the movie Sparticus
4. Read your own damn bible
By the way, I know some of these are stories are slightly fictionalized but they should give you a rough idea how bad slavery was and is.
Also if slavery is such a blessing why don't you come and be my slave for free. I could use some slave labor. I need my deck stained and my garage reorganized.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Peg, posted 12-01-2008 1:40 AM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by Peg, posted 12-02-2008 2:25 AM DevilsAdvocate has replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3129 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 56 of 406 (490086)
12-02-2008 7:39 AM
Reply to: Message 55 by Peg
12-02-2008 2:25 AM


Re: read again
Myself writes:
Also if slavery is such a blessing why don't you come and be my slave for free. I could use some slave labor. I need my deck stained and my garage reorganized.
look them up in the business directory
There are slaves in the business directory? They'll do it for free?
BTW, you may chalk me up to being an AH, I really don't really care. I have been on both sides of the fence religiously. I know what Christians believe and I have read the Bible cover to cover (which many Christians have not). I find it difficult that religous zealots(not just Christians) will find any means to try to justify the unjustifiable. How can you justify slavery, child abuse, rape, murder, plunder and other attrocities found in the Bible and many times condoned or even command by God Almighty himself.
To these religious zealots double standards and hypocricy are not important as long as they can back up their faith and their beliefs. I know I use to be one.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by Peg, posted 12-02-2008 2:25 AM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Peg, posted 12-03-2008 5:28 AM DevilsAdvocate has replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3129 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 58 of 406 (490247)
12-03-2008 9:13 AM
Reply to: Message 57 by Peg
12-03-2008 5:28 AM


Re: read again
Peg writes:
slaves worked in exchange for food and lodging...same way we do today
We have legalized slavery today? Where? From my understanding, slavery is outlawed in nearly every country in the world.
By definition, slaves are involuntarily property of other human beings. They have no rights, no personal property, receives no compensation (except food, lodging and bare essentials so they can live), cannot leave or travel without permission, are subject to the whims and desires of their masters, etc.
Exodus 21:20-21 writes:
If a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod and he dies at his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, he survives a day or two, no vengeance shall be taken; for he is his property.
Leviticus 22:11 writes:
But if a priest buys a slave as his property with his money, that one may eat of it, and those who are born in his house may eat of his food.
Peg writes:
a hebrew slave could have his whole family fed and housed which is why many chose to be slaves.
You are right, a "slave" that was a Hebrew was more like an indentured servant with certain rights bestowed. However, these rights did not pertain to non-Hebrew slaves. As to how these Hebrew and non-Hebrew slaves were actually treated, it is uncertain. However, based on the dialog of the OT it does not seem to be that much different from their neighboring countries as I pointed out earlier from the Code of Hammurabi.
Peg writes:
of course im not condoning it, but i dont believe that God condoned it either. People are going to do what they want to do. Did God force anyone to make people into slaves??? no
Definition of condone: "to overlook something illegal, objectionable, or the like". Do you consider slavery acceptable and/or legal? Than why are you letting god off the hook? He permited it. He could have made commandment #11 Thou shalt not take slaves or permit any Hebrew to become a slave. But not even once did he ever command the Israelites not to practice slavery.
just look at the teachings and words of Jesus Christ and you'll see that he had the mind of God...love your neighbor as yourself...love is the dominating nature of God, Jesus clearly showed this
This altruist behavior is not confined to Christianity. It is found in many religions, philosophies and cultures throughout history as seen here:
Buddhism writes:
Hurt not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful. (Udana-Varga 5:18)
Confusionism writes:
Do not do to others what you do not want them to do to you. (Analects 15:23)
Ancient Egyptian writes:
Do for one who may do for you, that you may cause him thus to do. (Tale of the Eloquent Peasant, 109 - 110 Translated by R.B. Parkinson dating to 1970 to 1640 BCE)
Hinduism writes:
This is the sum of duty: do not do to others what would cause pain if done to you. (Mahabharata 5:1517)
Islam writes:
None of you [truly] believes until he wishes for his brother what he wishes for himself. (Number 13 of Imam "Al-Nawawi's Forty Hadiths)
Jainism writes:
One should treat all creatures in the world as one would like to be treated. (Sutrakritanga 1.11.33)
Judaism writes:
What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbour. This is the whole Torah; all the rest is commentary. Go and learn it.(Talmud, Shabbath 31a)
Taoism writes:
Regard your neighbor's gain as your own gain, and your neighbor's loss as your own loss. (T'ai Shang Kan Ying P'ien)
Taoism writes:
The sage has no interest of his own, but takes the interests of the people as his own. He is kind to the kind; he is also kind to the unkind: for Virtue is kind. He is faithful to the faithful; he is also faithful to the unfaithful: for Virtue is faithful. (Tao Teh Ching)
Zoroasterism writes:
That nature alone is good which refrains from doing unto another whatsoever is not good for itself. Dadistan-i-dinik 94:5
also
Zoroasterism writes:
Whatever is disagreeable to yourself do not do unto others. (Shayast-na-Shayast 13:29)
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Peg, posted 12-03-2008 5:28 AM Peg has not replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3129 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 60 of 406 (490261)
12-03-2008 10:55 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by Buzsaw
12-01-2008 4:22 PM


Re: Biblical Inspiration
Buzzsaw writes:
There are just far too many significant fulfilled details to wave this off as fable or contemporary to the day they were written.
Such as?
How do we know these details where not filled in after the fact? The earliest copies of the writings of the OT i.e. the Dead Sea Scrolls date back to at the latest to the second century BC, well after all the events in the OT took place. This was more than ample time for the Jewish scribes and scholars to write in their 'fulfilled' prophecies after historical events took place.
As far as prophecies dealing with Jesus, who knows how much the early Christians concocted of this story to fit in with the earlier Jewish prophecies of a messiah? Historical record is very subject to outright fabrication and vaticinium ex eventu (writing about events that have already happened as if the author were living before the events took place). Therefore unless a historical writing is substantiated from a wide variety of other contemporary (at the same time) external sources it should be treated with skepticism.
Do you believe Nostradamus' writings as well? They also incorporate such vague generalities that they could be applied to just about any event in history. The same is true of the prophecies of the OT and NT. If not, than why pray tell do we get a slew of religious nuts predicting every 10 years that the world is going to end.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Buzsaw, posted 12-01-2008 4:22 PM Buzsaw has not replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3129 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 63 of 406 (490408)
12-04-2008 9:35 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by Peg
12-04-2008 6:26 AM


Re: read again
a God who sits back and does nothing when his people are being attacked, or a God who is willing to stand up and put his power to work in behalf of his people?
Where was God when over 6 million Jewish men, women and children were brutally murdered by the Nazis during WWII? Where was God when they tried to exterminate the Poles, Gypsies, handicapped, homosexuals, Jehovah's Witnesses, political opponents, living in Germany and other occupied countries?
Where was God when over 1.5 million Armenians were brutally massacred by the Ottoman Turks in the early 20th century?
Where was God when nearly 1 million Tutsi were ethnically cleansed i.e. butchered in Rwanda in 1994?
Where was he when 6 to 7 million people died in the Ukrain under Joseph Stalin's communist regime?
Where was he when Pol Pot systematically murdered nearly 26% (1.7 million) of his population in Cambodia in the name of communism.
Also, in probably the largest ethnicide event in human history, nearly 90% (10 to 20 million) of the Native American population was wiped out in 400 years of genocide against the Native Americans by European explorerers, colonists and settlers in the name of Christianity, the Manifest Destiny and even sometimes under the direct orders of American Presidents themselves i.e. Andrew Jackson's Indian Removal Acts.
Where was God when for nearly 1000 years the Christian world and even the holy Roman Catholic Church has brutally attacked and murdered people of other ethnicities and religions?
And these are just a meager few of the more recent ethnocide events of the last millenia.
So if your god is so good then why has he been silent about the millions upon millions of innocent human beings slaughtered in human history? Why does he seem to play favorites to one race of people?
No, it is up to human beings to police ourselves and to protect the innocent and unprotected.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by Peg, posted 12-04-2008 6:26 AM Peg has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by jaywill, posted 12-04-2008 11:09 AM DevilsAdvocate has replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3129 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 66 of 406 (490425)
12-04-2008 1:01 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by jaywill
12-04-2008 11:09 AM


Re: read again
I believe that the reemergence of Israel as a nation was a divine reaction to the Holocost. The HOlocost certainly provided a desperate incentive for the Jews and much of the world to be opened to the reformation of thier nation.
The Arabs had nothing to do with the Holocaust. The Holocaust was caused by Europeans specifically the German Nazi's not Arabs. So why are the Arabs punished for something they did not do.
Besides, not all Jews support the methods Israel have used to forcibly migrate all the Palestinian Arabs out of Israel. There is a division even in Israel of the Zionists and those who would seek more amiable relations with their Arab neighbors. This Zionism is not confined to the Jewish ethnic group either, unfortunately there are Zionist Christians who urge Israel to take back the West Bank and other contested lands to fulfill their interpretation of the Bible's prophecies. By the way, I am not anti-Semitic, my grandmother's is from Jewish German ancestry and my brother-in-law is Jewish.
If your concept is that the existence of God should mean that no one ever suffers, then that would make God only the God of comfortable situations.
That was not my point I was making. I was addressing Peg's statement:
a God who sits back and does nothing when his people are being attacked, or a God who is willing to stand up and put his power to work in behalf of his people?
. My answer is that your god chose to do nothing and did not put a stop to the murder of millions of innocent people. This is not about being 'comfortable', this is about life and death!
However, since you brought it up. Why is it that your god deliberately morally contradicts himself throughout the Bible? In the Bible, he not only condones but also commands the murder of children, slavery, rape and other atrocities.
Many Christians liken God to a father, however how many fathers would lead there families to murder their neighbors and enslave their neighbors children. What kind of sick, sadistic father would do this?
History may be headed in that direction in eternity. But for now, God is not only the God of people in comfortable circumstances. He is also the God of people in terribly difficult circumstances.
Where? Can you produce a single shred of evidence that this mysterious god of your exists? And why has he done nothing to stop any of these atrocities?
While we are at it may we ask this too? Where was God when YOU were committing your sins against people ? Why did God not immediately slay you for your sins against people you have wronged?
According to your logic, your god would have to self-annihilate because of the pain and death he has deliberately caused to humankind.
How do you know what I have and have not done? Now you are going to judge me? Go take a hike.
How did a big sinner like you get away with so much? Where was God?
How do you know what I having "gotten away with"? You do not even know me? Who is doing the judging here Jay?
Do you think the fact that you can point out the crimes of others makes you somehow more righteous than they ?
What do you mean by righteous? Am I more moral according to the moral codes adopted by most of today's humanity? Yes, I am more moral than Adolph Hitler and Pol Pot! Am I perfect in a moral way? No. Who is? Not even god is by your own standards.
Hint. No one is getting away with anything.
That includes your god!
So you too, like Pol Pot, need to repent to be saved from God's righteous final judgment. All have sinned and come short of the glory of God.
Your sad attempt to convert me is disturbing. Quoting scripture at me is useless. I have read the bible and it is full of contradictions. The problem is that if God is the god of the OT I do not want anything to do with him, based on an ethical standpoint. Why is our moral standard today higher than that of the OT? Have you ever though of that? Why is it wrong for slavery and ethnic cleansing in today's modern society, yet your god condoned and commanded it over 4000 years ago?
Did you ask "Where was God when I was taking advantage of someone for my own selfish ends?"
Again, why are you trying to turn this around? However, to answer your damn question, do you really think me committing small infractions of our moral code is anywhere equal to the murder of millions of people? I will be humble and say I make mistakes everyday but that is not near the havoc that some tyrants have caused our human race.
I asked these questions to get you to think. They are rhetorical and not meant to be taken literally. I see no evidence of god's existence. Even if I did, if he were to be considered a moral and good god he would not be the god of the Bible who needlessly inflicts pain and death wherever he turns.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by jaywill, posted 12-04-2008 11:09 AM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by jaywill, posted 12-04-2008 3:40 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3129 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 71 of 406 (490448)
12-04-2008 4:36 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by jaywill
12-04-2008 3:40 PM


Re: read again
Quote me where I said they did ?
You stated earlier:
I believe that the reemergence of Israel as a nation was a divine reaction to the Holocost. The HOlocost certainly provided a desperate incentive for the Jews and much of the world to be opened to the reformation of thier nation.
If this divine reaction to the Holocost is for God to reinstate the state of Israel (that is what it seems that you are implying here), than why are the Arabs being punished in the process? Your intrepretation that Israel has a god given right to reoccupy Palestine is part of the problem of what is happening in the Middle East. This adds fuel to the fire of already strained political tensions between Israel and the rest of the Middle East. In no way am I advocating that Arabs have a right to commit terrorism in response to the forced settlements by Israel, however it is important that we understand the underlying causes for the conflict that happening over there and stop egging Israel to take on the rest of the Middle East as many Christians (and Jews) here in the US have done for the last 60+ years. Ok I will get off my soapbox now.
So your point of "the absent God" does nor persuade me.
I was not inviting you to a full scale political debate on the region
No, but if you make an assertion of divine support for a particular ethnic group you better back it up with solid evidence. Otherwise I will discuss this in depth. This debate board is all about backing up your assertions with facts and evidence otherwise go to a religous discussion board where everyone agrees with you.
I am more interested in Bible Study - what does it really mean?
It means nothing if it does not apply to reality.
I do not think an absent apathetic God is witnessed by the things you mentioned. My reasons for the most part are because of biblical testimony. I did refer to the reamergence of modern day Israel which has many political problems.
I could care less what you believe but if you make an unsubstantiated assertion on a discussion board i.e. "God supports the nationalization of Israel" than you better be able to back up your assertions with evidence.
Did you ask what kind of God would do these things?
Sure why not? What does this have to do with anything? Are you trying to justify the "good" things that you say god did in the OT against the attrocities that he caused to occur? Does this not go against your premise that no matter what you do good it cannot overcome a single thing you do wrong? So how does this apply to your god?
And I am more impressed with the testimony of people like Corrie Ten Boom who was in a concentration camp with Jews. Or of Watchman Nee who was locked up in a Communist prison for 20 years.
I have read the story of Corrie Ten Boom and many others as well. Do you honestly think only Christians do the only good in this world? Should I list all the good things that atheists, agnostics and non-christians have done that have made this world a better place?
The enduranance and indistructible nature of their trust in God, in spirte of it all, impresses me more than your moral outrage. God still is.
I am not trying to "impress you with my moral outrage." I am trying to illustrate that your god you describe in the Bible is not as good as you think he is even by your own standards.
Since you brought it up - on a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being the most righteous, where would you place yourself and where would you place Jesus Christ ?
Would that be the stories we here in the Bible about Jesus Christ? We do not even know how accurate these stories are. That would be like asking how I racked up with the story of Buddha or Confuciuous. I have no clue who the real Jesus was? So I can't even compare. What difference does it make anyways. Stop turning this around. It isn't about me.
On a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being the most just, where would you place yourself and where would you place the God of the Bible?
I would be higher as most decent human beings on this planet. I am not sending my daughter to eternal torment if she doesn't believe in me or rejects me. If my daughter didn't want anything to do with me, I would still love her. If she was in trouble (i.e. drugs, etc) I would not even hesitate to go and save her. Would your god do this? Why is sending everyone to hell who doesn't believe in someone who hasn't spoken with humanity or even made us aware of his existence for 2000+ years. It would be like me going away from family for 50 years and then expecting them to recognise me when I got back (except god has never come back). Why does your god plant fossils of millions of extinct animals and plants, decieve just about every intelligent person into thinking that the Earth and Universe are billions of years old and make the Bible contradict itself? Why should we trust your god???
When are you going to come out of the closet and give a book that rivals the Bible if God has a thing or two to learn at your feet about ethics ?
I don't need a 2000+ year old book to tell me about ethics. We have many codes of ethics from throughout history which have evolved and given humans a more equal footing i.e. The Constitution, the UN Bill of Human Rights, etc.
Should we be able to broadcast your whole life in every action on this computer screen, would we see a glorious person who is qualified to rebuke God and correct Jesus Christ?
This is a religous argument. You have not provided any evidence as to why we should believe your god is real.
Is there no one you have come accross in your life time who would not smile standing beside your death bed ? Think about it. I bet there is.
Not that I can think of. There has been no one that I have treated badly where they would smile or spit on my grave. Have you?
You didn't read the Bible well.
You have no clue who I am or my religious background. Don't assume you do. I am tired of certain arrogant religious people (not all, my wife is a Christian) who think they have the God given right to berate and ridicule anyone who disagrees with their religious beliefs.
This is not a religious conversion board, go take your religious banter elsewhere.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by jaywill, posted 12-04-2008 3:40 PM jaywill has not replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3129 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 74 of 406 (490457)
12-04-2008 8:34 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by Buzsaw
12-04-2008 6:58 PM


Re: read again
Buzzsaw writes:
You mean like last century when secularist anti Biblical governments which slaughtered over a hundred million of their own citizens including babes and like pagan jungle cultures which ate their neighbors and their kids as well as others which sacrificed children in fires?
What a short-sided bigoted view of the world you have.
Or perhaps you have in mind so many anti Biblical cultures today like India (Hindu), Buddhist cultures, Islamic nations and communist nations such as China, Viet Nam etc where Christian families are killed and tortured and others whose homes and churches are burned.
What is an anti-Biblical culture? Can you please define that?
You need to study history and religion before making such ignorant and uninformed remarks.
Yes, Christian missionaries have been targets of attack throughout history but this is not unique to Christianity. Persecution has been targeted against people of all religions and ethnicities sometimes from other cultures, ethnicities and religions and sometimes by their own i.e. the Roman Catholic vs Protestant conflict over Northern Ireland. In India both sides of the religious equation: Christians and Hindus have been accused of atrocities as seen here: India's vengeful Christians turn to murder as Hindus step up their killing campaign and Christians in India face prospect of more attacks by extremists.
As far as Buddhism, this religion explicitly teaches the sanctity of all life and is deeply pacifistic. If you harm other humans in the Buddhist "culture" than you are not practicing true Buddhism.
In fact you have it backwards about Vietnam, many of the Buddhists in Vietnam were persecuted and sometimes killed not by the communist Vietcong but by our own allies, the southern Vietnamese Catholic regime of President Diem. In fact it was the French who colonized and by sword point converted many Vietnamese from Buddhism to become Catholics in the 19th and early 20th century. It was the French Catholics that enacted laws specifically targeted to taking away the rights of the Buddhist population. Several Buddhists committed acts of self-immolation in order to bring to light President Diem's corrupt regime which eventually was overthrown by a bloody coupe-de-ta by his own generals.
So your claim that Christianity is somehow innocent of violence and is the only religion subject to persecution is totally untrue and is a bold face lie.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Buzsaw, posted 12-04-2008 6:58 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by subbie, posted 12-04-2008 8:48 PM DevilsAdvocate has not replied
 Message 83 by Buzsaw, posted 12-05-2008 11:32 AM DevilsAdvocate has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024