Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,392 Year: 3,649/9,624 Month: 520/974 Week: 133/276 Day: 7/23 Hour: 3/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Viagra & Evolution
subbie
Member (Idle past 1275 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 16 of 55 (490454)
12-04-2008 7:56 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by RAZD
12-04-2008 7:17 PM


Re: perhaps it is a natural reaction
quote:
Of course one very simple explanation is that it is a reaction to overpopulation.
Interesting suggestion. I have a couple of observations, though.
I'm reminded of something I heard, quite some time ago, about an experiment were researchers kept mice in extremely over crowded conditions and discovered that some of the mice became sexually attracted to members of the same sex.
Wouldn't your suggestion and the experiment that I recall (if I'm recalling accurately) mean that, in effect, evolution is operating to the detriment of some individuals in favor of the rest of the population? If so, I must admit that I'm hard-pressed to conceive of an evolutionary explanation for such a phenomenon. It seems counter intuitive.

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by RAZD, posted 12-04-2008 7:17 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by RAZD, posted 12-06-2008 9:35 AM subbie has not replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1275 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 45 of 55 (490721)
12-07-2008 5:06 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Taz
12-07-2008 2:45 PM


A dangerous path....
quote:
That said (and you have my permission to call me heartless), I don't want [people with Down Syndrome] to reproduce.
Let's have a bit of fun, and see if we can give the cdesign proponentists a little ammunition. (Seems to be the least we can do since they give themselves so little to work with.)
I'm assuming the reason that you don't want them to reproduce is because they reduce the overall fitness of the species and are, on the whole, a drain on resources.
What steps, if any, would you be willing to accept for society to discourage them reproducing? I have my own conclusion to this question, fairly firmly held, that I'll share. But I'm curious to hear what you (or anyone else) has to say on the matter.

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Taz, posted 12-07-2008 2:45 PM Taz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by Huntard, posted 12-07-2008 5:33 PM subbie has not replied
 Message 47 by RAZD, posted 12-07-2008 5:35 PM subbie has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024