The irresolvability of the creation/evolution debate

Your list of 20 "Evolutionary idiocy (More or less standard dogma)" includes at least 15 that have nothing to do with the theory of evolution. Of the remaining 5 some are wrong, while others are meaningless statements.You're not doing too well. Perhaps you need to cut and paste from more accurate sources.

---

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

Adam is a myth. Your whole argument is based on myth.This is the Science Forum. Surely you can come up with some science for us, eh?

---

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

We need to figure out what you are saying. So far you are posting what appears to be a low grade of unassociated pseudo-mystical gibberish.Perhaps you could be more clear in your posts? That way your "particular viewpoint" might not elude us so badly.

---

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

1) It reduced me to laughter.
2) I'm a scientist, bring it on--but do it elsewhere, as
3) This is entirely off topic for this thread. You should start a new thread so all of your nonsense could be kept in one convenient place.

---

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.