Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,844 Year: 4,101/9,624 Month: 972/974 Week: 299/286 Day: 20/40 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why did they cover their nakedness?
jaywill
Member (Idle past 1969 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 51 of 81 (492566)
01-01-2009 11:35 AM
Reply to: Message 50 by ICANT
01-01-2009 11:13 AM


Re: Who told you ... ?
The same who that tells you when you do something wrong.
I'll think about it.
Eve did not know she was naked when she ate the fruit as her eyes were not opened until the man ate the fruit. When their eyes were opened then they knew evil.
I don't know how you can be so sure about that. Why not each as soon as they ate had their eyes opened?
Insisting from the text that the opening of the eyes had to wait until both had eaten, is at best, speculative.
The only being that convicts anyone of anything is the Holy Spirit.
No ICANT. The Devil also accuses the conscience.
Now the Holy Spirit is God. God said "Who told you that you were naked?" So God is not the best choice, IMO in that passage. However I would not argue that God does of course convict of man's sin.
The Devil as the Accuser of the brethren is a possibility. He wants always to separate man from God and God from man. It is typical of the Devil to accuse -
"Hey Adam and Eve, did you know you guys are naked? Better run away from God. Quick, I know a couple of good trees you can hide behind."
Just musing here. I have no firm opinion on it yet.
The trigger was man willfully disobeying God. He chose to eat the fruit. He was not deceived by the serpent. The woman gave him the fruit and he chose to eat it knowing what it was.
I personally believe the man chose to eat the fruit and die with the woman as they were one. Genesis 2:24.
That does make for a great romantic love story, I must admit.
Probably though, Adam should have said "Sweetie, you're on your own this time."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by ICANT, posted 01-01-2009 11:13 AM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by ICANT, posted 01-01-2009 12:20 PM jaywill has not replied
 Message 53 by Bailey, posted 01-01-2009 1:24 PM jaywill has not replied
 Message 55 by Bailey, posted 01-01-2009 3:07 PM jaywill has replied

  
jaywill
Member (Idle past 1969 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 56 of 81 (492602)
01-01-2009 6:19 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by Bailey
01-01-2009 3:07 PM


Re: A whole lotta Love
Again, the character of the Father would not have been accurately represented had Adam performed as you say he should have. We thanked the Father for Adam's sacrafice; it allows awareness of great Truth. We Love the Father for His Son's sacrafice; it allows everliving companionship and justice. Both sacrafices, in their individual way, allow mankind to enjoy the inner circle of Life. Simply put, Reality would not be fulfilled had either been prevented.
Baily,
Before you get too attached to that interpretation you should realize that God was not happy with Adam sinning period.
Had Adam really expressed God by following his wife into rebellion, I think there should be some hint that it pleased God which it didn't.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by Bailey, posted 01-01-2009 3:07 PM Bailey has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Blue Jay, posted 01-01-2009 7:05 PM jaywill has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024