Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Simultaneous appearance of written language and common man
Peg
Member (Idle past 4951 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 10 of 86 (492518)
01-01-2009 5:05 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Tanndarr
12-30-2008 6:41 PM


Hi Tanndarr,
Tandarr writes:
Could you please show me the correlation of the appearance of modern man and fully formed writing systems that is consistent with either creation or with survival after the flood. When I look all I see is unrelated writing systems appearing in different areas demonstrating a smooth transition from proto-writing through complex writing systems.
im basing this is on hard archeological evidence... i'm basing it on the written language which includes the use of symbols and pictures to communicate abstract thought...ie, 'this land was purchased by so and so' OR 'the king has decreed the following set of laws' etc etc etc
the earliest known writings are known to come from the Mesopotamia region and the strongest finds have been in Syrian finds such as Babylonia/Assyria dating back around 3,000BCE which places them at the time after the flood.
this is in tune with the bibles account that people were all situated in this region of the earth before spreading abroad.
What can account for the seemingly 'unrelated' written languages appearing in different places is that, after the languages were confused at Babel (Babylon) then the people spread out and had to develop their own forms of writing for these new languages.
a few external links you may be interested in.
History of Writing
History of writing - Wikipedia
HISTORY OF WRITING

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Tanndarr, posted 12-30-2008 6:41 PM Tanndarr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Dr Jack, posted 01-01-2009 9:10 AM Peg has replied
 Message 20 by Tanndarr, posted 01-01-2009 3:30 PM Peg has replied
 Message 21 by RAZD, posted 01-01-2009 4:58 PM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4951 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 11 of 86 (492519)
01-01-2009 5:12 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by AnswersInGenitals
12-30-2008 7:33 PM


Re: Did god draw the cave paintings?
you're right
i dont trust carbon dating...not one little bit
As this subject is not about the accuracy or 'inaccuracy' of carbon dating though, i wont be going into it... nor do i need to be an expert to be skeptical.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 12-30-2008 7:33 PM AnswersInGenitals has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by cavediver, posted 01-01-2009 7:17 AM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4951 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 14 of 86 (492548)
01-01-2009 9:26 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by Dr Jack
01-01-2009 9:10 AM


they used calendars
actually they invented calendars and recorded their history using dates...this is how we know when certain kings came to power, how long they ruled for, who they invaded and conquered etc
carbon dating a written record is not necessary

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Dr Jack, posted 01-01-2009 9:10 AM Dr Jack has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by lyx2no, posted 01-01-2009 9:37 AM Peg has replied
 Message 19 by Dr Jack, posted 01-01-2009 10:24 AM Peg has replied
 Message 22 by Jon, posted 01-01-2009 9:54 PM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4951 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 16 of 86 (492554)
01-01-2009 9:42 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by lyx2no
01-01-2009 9:37 AM


Re: Carbon Dating Check ” Status: Pass.
and yet, if it has a date inscribed, you could just look at the date

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by lyx2no, posted 01-01-2009 9:37 AM lyx2no has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by lyx2no, posted 01-01-2009 10:07 AM Peg has replied
 Message 18 by petrophysics1, posted 01-01-2009 10:19 AM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4951 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 23 of 86 (492642)
01-01-2009 11:32 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by lyx2no
01-01-2009 10:07 AM


Re: Look! Up in the Sky. It's a Bird. It's a Plane. It's a Rather Simple Point.
not if carbon dating is flawed to begin with
there are other methods of dating they can use...type of material, style of writing for example
the writings of historians who may have recorded certain events, they can look at other artifacts collected from the site
how did they date things before carbon dating was invented?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by lyx2no, posted 01-01-2009 10:07 AM lyx2no has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Coyote, posted 01-01-2009 11:54 PM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4951 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 24 of 86 (492643)
01-01-2009 11:43 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by petrophysics1
01-01-2009 10:19 AM


Re: Carbon Dating Check ” Status: Pass.
they can scientifically test the material to find out what type of material was used, where it is found and the era that the particular materials were used...they can also cross check with similar materials etc
for example, the shroud of turin was found to be a fake long before it was carbon dated. The new catholic encyclopedia says “There is no evidence of a shroud during the first centuries of the Christian era,” so, if it was around then, there would have been evidence of it among the early christians and those who actually handled the body of christ
they could also compare the writings with other writings to see if they are all in agreement... the writings of 'St Thomas' was checked this way and it was found that the ideas of this supposed gospel was in contradiction to the teachings of Christ and so it was excluded from the biblical cannon.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by petrophysics1, posted 01-01-2009 10:19 AM petrophysics1 has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4951 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 26 of 86 (492645)
01-01-2009 11:54 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Dr Jack
01-01-2009 10:24 AM


i agree with you there, we would definitely need to know how any such calendars worked
about the dates though, the jews kept the dates of their history meticulously...so meticulously in fact that we know the exact year of the flood, of Adams creation, of the exodus from egypt ect
it stands to reason that if the jews kept dates and worked from a clander, other nations also did this

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Dr Jack, posted 01-01-2009 10:24 AM Dr Jack has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by PaulK, posted 01-02-2009 1:25 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 30 by anglagard, posted 01-02-2009 1:34 AM Peg has replied
 Message 48 by Kapyong, posted 01-02-2009 5:04 PM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4951 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 27 of 86 (492646)
01-01-2009 11:59 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Tanndarr
01-01-2009 3:30 PM


Re: Hard archeological evidence
Tanndarr writes:
We see several writing methods evolve simultaneously at different times in different places from their local proto-writing methods. We do not see their proto-writing stopped to be replaced by a new God given writing system; nor do we see all systems developing from a single master system distributed by the wandering nations after Babel
yes thats right
we do see that because when the languages became confused, each group went off in their own direction and formulated their own writing systems
hence why the sudden appearance of various types and styles of writting.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Tanndarr, posted 01-01-2009 3:30 PM Tanndarr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Jon, posted 01-02-2009 3:25 AM Peg has replied
 Message 51 by Tanndarr, posted 01-02-2009 5:52 PM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4951 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 28 of 86 (492649)
01-02-2009 12:14 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by Jon
01-01-2009 9:54 PM


Re: An Easy Question
until we understand what Incan written language was, we may never know
but i see what you are saying

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Jon, posted 01-01-2009 9:54 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Jon, posted 01-02-2009 3:27 AM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4951 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 33 of 86 (492696)
01-02-2009 5:10 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by anglagard
01-02-2009 1:34 AM


Re: Exact Year
i dont need to bob and weave..im more then happy to address this
chronology is worked out by counting the time between major events... im giving only the 3 you've asked for here...there are other events that also add to biblical chronology.
Exodus from Egypt - 1513 BCE
Two chronological statements harmonize to produce this date. Solomon began the building of the temple in his fourth year of kingship (1034 B.C.E.), and this is stated at 1 Kings 6:1 to be “the four hundred and eightieth year” from the time of the Exodus (1513 B.C.E.).
the flood - 2370 B.C.E
Many years were spent building the ark, and they went into it “in the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month (Oct-NOv), on the seventeenth day of the month.” Ge 7:11
Adams creation - 4026 B.C.E
Adam lived 930 years, Ge 5:3-32 gives a line of decent from Adam, to the start of the flood (when noah was 600yrs old) there were a total of 1,656 years.
im happy to clarify anything here with more detailed information.
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by anglagard, posted 01-02-2009 1:34 AM anglagard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Brian, posted 01-02-2009 6:12 AM Peg has replied
 Message 40 by Coyote, posted 01-02-2009 11:59 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 49 by anglagard, posted 01-02-2009 5:21 PM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4951 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 34 of 86 (492697)
01-02-2009 5:25 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by Jon
01-02-2009 3:25 AM


Re: Hard archeological evidence
i have read your links and it is still glaringly obvious that ...as is stated in paragraph 1 of your 2nd link...
'it is all but universally accepted among scholars that the Sumerian cuneiform script of c. 3000 BC is the earliest form of writing.'
the history of human writing is very new, especially if you take prehistory into consideration or believe that humans have been evolving fom millions of years on this planet
the last 6,000 years is nothing more then the blink of an eye, yet it seems this is where our 'humanity' began

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Jon, posted 01-02-2009 3:25 AM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by bluescat48, posted 01-02-2009 10:02 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 39 by Otto Tellick, posted 01-02-2009 11:45 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 43 by PaulK, posted 01-02-2009 1:54 PM Peg has not replied
 Message 47 by Jon, posted 01-02-2009 3:43 PM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4951 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 36 of 86 (492702)
01-02-2009 7:00 AM
Reply to: Message 35 by Brian
01-02-2009 6:12 AM


Re: Exact Year
the date for the building of the temple comes from following chronology...from the exodus in egypt to the construction of the temple was 479years.
the Bible does not name the Pharaoh who initiated the oppression upon the Israelites (Ex 1:8-22) so it is not possible to assign these events to any specific dynasty nor to the reign of any particular Pharaoh of secular history.
its more likely that the name “Rameses” was simply the name of a district in the time of Joseph.
all that scripture you've quoted says is that they built the cities 'Pithom' and 'Rameses' It does not say that Rameses was a person/ruler

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Brian, posted 01-02-2009 6:12 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Brian, posted 01-02-2009 7:22 AM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4951 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 54 of 86 (492814)
01-03-2009 3:02 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by Jon
01-02-2009 3:43 PM


my apologies
i was sure it was the 2nd link, but when i checked it wasnt there but was one of the links i followed from that page, so i apologise for the confusion.
It was actually here Vina symbols - Wikipedia
i wasn't plagiarizing ... not deliberately anyway lol
Jon writes:
2000 A.D. -6000 yrs = ~4000 B.C. for appearance of 'humanity'
3000 B.C. for appearance of writing.
For a difference of: 1000 years!
So, considering their dissimilar date of appearance”basing this on your dates”, what is it that writing has to do with the quality of being human? And what of societies that to this day have no writing system?
And this takes us back to your 2nd Link about proto writing of 4,000BCE ...
and to the link for the vinca symbols that i posted above.
Perhaps there is an even older writing that has not been discovered yet. Moses got his information about the pre flood world from written records as can be seen by his comment... “This is the book of the generations of Adam.” The use of the word book implies writing. ”Adam’s written history’ (Gen. 2:5 to 5:2)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Jon, posted 01-02-2009 3:43 PM Jon has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by fallacycop, posted 01-03-2009 3:35 AM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4951 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 55 of 86 (492818)
01-03-2009 3:25 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by Rahvin
01-03-2009 3:01 AM


Re: The Real Question
please dont twist my words into something absurd
i was not saying that at all
please name me one animal with a language the doesnt consist of grunts and growls... one animal that writes its history in stone ... one animal that has anything remotely similar to human language and writing
humans of today are unique to this ability and even those who cannot read or write can still speak a language and can 'learn' to read and write it
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Rahvin, posted 01-03-2009 3:01 AM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by Rahvin, posted 01-03-2009 3:39 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 64 by Jon, posted 01-03-2009 2:21 PM Peg has replied
 Message 69 by bluegenes, posted 01-03-2009 7:47 PM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4951 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 56 of 86 (492820)
01-03-2009 3:30 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by anglagard
01-02-2009 5:21 PM


Re: Exact Year
anglagard writes:
Now you do realize that these dates conflict with a lot of evidence from several fields so be prepared for some serious objections from many professionals, myself included if I feel anything is overlooked.
i appreciate that and fully expect it.
Please keep in mind that i have no external evidence for these dates...it is purely based on biblical chronology so if i was a jew and wanted to know when the exodus was for instance, i'd grab my old testament and use the biblical chronology to work it out.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by anglagard, posted 01-02-2009 5:21 PM anglagard has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by Jon, posted 01-03-2009 2:53 PM Peg has not replied
 Message 70 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 01-03-2009 8:46 PM Peg has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024