Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,356 Year: 3,613/9,624 Month: 484/974 Week: 97/276 Day: 25/23 Hour: 3/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why did they cover their nakedness?
Blue Jay
Member (Idle past 2716 days)
Posts: 2843
From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts
Joined: 02-04-2008


Message 57 of 81 (492617)
01-01-2009 7:05 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by jaywill
01-01-2009 6:19 PM


Re: A whole lotta Love
Hi, Jaywill.
Perhaps this is a little off-topic, but I'm curious how you would respond to these questions:
If Adam and Eve had not eaten of the fruit, what would have happened? Would we all be living in the Garden of Eden right now? My church maintains that we would not have existed, because procreation was not possible until after the Fall (maybe they didn't even have reproductive parts to be ashamed of?---that's a weird thought).
If Adam had refused to follow Eve and get kicked out of the Garden, what would have become of them (and us)? Would God have had to create a new husband for Eve (or wife for Adam)?
In other words, could God's plan for us have been fulfilled if Adam and Eve had not been kicked out of the Garden?
If not, how could Adam's Transgression be anything but the fulfillment of God's plan?

I'm Bluejay.
Darwin loves you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by jaywill, posted 01-01-2009 6:19 PM jaywill has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by Peg, posted 01-02-2009 3:36 AM Blue Jay has replied

  
Blue Jay
Member (Idle past 2716 days)
Posts: 2843
From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts
Joined: 02-04-2008


Message 60 of 81 (492738)
01-02-2009 2:02 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by Peg
01-02-2009 3:36 AM


Re: A whole lotta Love
Hi, Peg.
Peg writes:
i know you've asked for jaywill to respond, but i'd like to answer this one and compare my understanding with jaywills
It's an open forum: anyone's welcome.
-----
Peg writes:
1. Procreation was always on the cards for Adam & Eve. the command God gave them was not only to abstain from eating of the tree but to ... “Be fruitful and become many and fill the earth and subdue it
the only way to become many was by using their reproductive systems, so they must have had them and sex was a part of their ability to reproduce.
I don't agree that this points to their ability to reproduce right away. They are (as Taz likes to say) children, after all. The Mormon argument goes like this:
  • Mortality (and reproduction) was necessary for God's plan to be fulfilled
  • Mortality (and reproduction) could only come about by disobedience
  • Therefore, in order for God's plan to be fulfilled, somebody had to disobey God
  • Therefore, God gave Adam and Eve contradicting laws ("reproduce and "don't eat from the tree") so that they would have to break one
    Kind of sucks, I know, but it kind of makes sense in a roundabout sort of way. We Mormons are usually very careful to admit that we don't know for certain, though.
    But, it also explains why 1 Timothy (the scripture you quoted) says that Adam wasn't deceived: he knew exactly what he was doing, and he did it on purpose, because God's plan required it of him. In the Book of Mormon, we have:
    quote:
    "Adam fell that men might be; and men are, that they might have joy"
    -2 Nephi 2:25
    I've never actually heard it claimed that Adam and Eve didn't have gonads in the Garden, but I have heard it claimed that their gonads were non-functional, like a pre-pubescent child's. So, Adam and Eve were unable to reproduce until after the Fall.
    So, basically, God set Eve up, and the serpent informed her of this, and she gave in to his temptation. And, after Eve took of the fruit, Adam knew he had to as well.
    -----
    Peg writes:
    One thing we do know for sure is that if neither of them had fallen from Gods favor, then they would still be alive today as the original parents to all of us... and quite a few billion more people... and the whole earth would be a garden of eden.
    I contend that you do not know this at all.

    I'm Bluejay.
    Darwin loves you.

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 58 by Peg, posted 01-02-2009 3:36 AM Peg has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 61 by ICANT, posted 01-02-2009 2:12 PM Blue Jay has replied
     Message 65 by Peg, posted 01-03-2009 2:25 AM Blue Jay has not replied

      
    Blue Jay
    Member (Idle past 2716 days)
    Posts: 2843
    From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts
    Joined: 02-04-2008


    Message 62 of 81 (492771)
    01-02-2009 5:26 PM
    Reply to: Message 61 by ICANT
    01-02-2009 2:12 PM


    Re: A whole lotta Love
    Hi, ICANT.
    ICANT writes:
    You ever thought about they did not even know they were naked.
    Yeah.
    But, I think everyone else has covered that one well enough that it didn't need to be repeated by me.
    -----
    ICANT writes:
    If they did not know they were naked they did not know they were different.
    They'd have to be on some pretty spectacular drugs not to notice that there were differences, I think. But, you might be somewhat right: maybe they just associated the "differences" with the other personal traits that they used to distinguish one another.
    Who knows, really?
    I'm not married to a particular interpretation (forgive the pun).

    I'm Bluejay.
    Darwin loves you.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 61 by ICANT, posted 01-02-2009 2:12 PM ICANT has not replied

      
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024