|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Innevitable Armageddon (theory) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
DevilsAdvocate Member (Idle past 3122 days) Posts: 1548 Joined: |
no, God will put an end to war by destroying war mongers those who are seeking peace will get it. This peace-loving nature of God you claim flies in the face of your his warmongering nature of your god in the Bible as well as your own previous statements extolling armageddon:
Peg writes: if you look at the bible armageddon, it is said to be Gods war to end wickedness and human suffering ... so, for me, Armageddon is something to look forward to ... Bring it on I Samuel 15:18 writes: Go and completely destroy those wicked people, the Amalekites; make war on them until you have wiped them out. Revelations 19:11 writes: I saw heaven standing open and there before me was a white horse, whose rider is called Faithful and True. With justice he judges and makes war, . His eyes are like blazing fire, and on his head are many crowns. He has a name written on him that no one knows but he himself. He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God. The armies of heaven were following him, riding on white horses and dressed in fine linen, white and clean. Out of his mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations. "He will rule them with an iron scepter." He treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty. On his robe and on his thigh he has this name written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS. And I saw an angel standing in the sun, who cried in a loud voice to all the birds flying in midair, "Come, gather together for the great supper of God, so that you may eat the flesh of kings, generals, and mighty men, of horses and their riders, and the flesh of all people, free and slave, small and great. Even Jesus says Matthew 10:34 writes: Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. Dr. Carl Sagan
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Bailey Member (Idle past 4390 days) Posts: 574 From: Earth Joined: |
Thank you for the exchange.
Mantis writes: Bailey writes: DA writes: A very uplifting assertion, though it appears unfortunately untrue; reality will manifest itself whether it is ignored or pursued. The conscious pursuit of armageddon is only one of a number of ways to reach the 'innevitable'. We as a species have incidentally (accidently?) arranged the possibility of armageddon within our reality, independently of such purposes as it may provide. This simply implies we have created the egg before the chicken; we do not need to desire these 'innevitable' scrambled eggs in order to blow up the chicken though. Armageddon is not innevitable unless we as a species desire it to be! Historically speaking, reality suggests armageddon (species suicide) is seemingly innevitable. Technology may sustain humanity to its population limit, but it will not likely save humanity from final and fatal catastrophe, and military technologies like weaponized chemicals and atom bombs will likely facilitate such a disaster. Additionally, armageddon is simply possible before fatally innevitable or finally purposed and the bulk of mankind does not appear to fancy a desire to participate in Armageddon's festivities. Regardless of fanatical persistence, religious fringe beliefs of select few, though increasing, have not willed their fate upon the rest of us; to think otherwise is to accept religion. Respectively, our species need not desire armageddon, or the threat it seems to provide, in order for it to manifest in reality. In conclusion, being naive to such ends throughout the ages has encouraged progress thus far. Hence, ignoring the reality of Armageddon should reasonably permit and promote its future manifestation. A prerequisite stipulating preconceived desire for annihilation of mankind does not seem necessary to promote the onset of armageddon (species suicide); such a reality will manifest itself whether it is ignored, pursued or otherwise. Respectively, ignoring the reality of the Golden Rule should reasonably permit and promote its future manifestation; one need not subscribe to succumb. We may likely agree that one must believe in something or they'll fall for anything. I'm afraid I disagree strongly with this. Belief tends to make more people fall for stuff than disbelief. In fact, "disbelief," in my mind, is the diametric opposite of "falling for something." Belief leads to attachment, and attachment leads to passion, which is what raises tempers and causes wars. Disbelief, or at least healthy skepticism, goes a long way towards curbing one's passion. Now, if everybody could believe in the same something, it would work out fine, but, as many religions are finding, the only way to get people to believe in the same something is by force. Which, ironically, defeats the entire purpose of trying to get everyone to believe in the same something. Ironically, I've now come to the same conclusion that you did, by assuming the exact opposite conditions. That's depressing. lol That last comment was more tongue in cheek. Even after posting 'believe', I couldn't get the words 'offer crediblity' out of my head ... Shoulda made the edit. One Love Edited by Bailey, : grammar I'm not here to mock or condemn what you believe, I'm just a fool playing with ideas. My only intention is to tickle your thinker. Trust nothing I say. Learn for yourself. Think for yourself. Mercy Trumps Judgement,Love Weary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Peg Member (Idle past 4950 days) Posts: 2703 From: melbourne, australia Joined: |
as a person yourself who chose to fight a war, you no doubt did so because you believed it was the only way to accomplish some sort of peace?
Is it so unreasonable to believe that God might see a need for war under certain circumstances?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2126 days) Posts: 6117 Joined: |
Armageddon is not inevitable in this context because Armageddon is a myth.
And Armageddon tired of it! ; - ) Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DevilsAdvocate Member (Idle past 3122 days) Posts: 1548 Joined: |
as a person yourself who chose to fight a war, First, I did not CHOOSE to fight a war. I choose to serve in the United States military to defend the rights and freedoms granted to my country by its Constitution. If I am ordered to fight in a war than I am willingly or unwillingly obligated to fight that war. However that does not mean I have to (privately) agree with the reasons we went to war in the first place though publically I cannot express this opinion due to the obvious conflict of interest and negative image it would give to the military (which could potentially weaken its resolve).
you no doubt did so because you believed it was the only way to accomplish some sort of peace? Is it so unreasonable to believe that God might see a need for war under certain circumstances? Did God abide by the internationally recognised Geneva Convention, NATO and U.S. military rules of engagement, the Uniform Code of Military Justice, or any of the other hundreds of Laws of Armed Conflict that helps protect against unwanton and needless suffering? I think not. If your blood-thirsty god was tried in at the International Code of Justice at the Hague or by a military tribunal in the US he would most certainly be convicted of no less than 12 exceptionally grave war crimes (which he most certainly would be subject to as these are crimes which were "part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of such crimes"): 1. Willful killing, or causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health2. Torture or inhumane treatment 3. Unlawful wanton destruction or appropriation of property 4. Depriving a prisoner of war of a fair trial 5. Unlawful deportation, confinement or transfer 6. Directing attacks against civilians 7. Killing a surrendered combatant 8. Settlement of occupied territory 9. Settlement of occupied territory 10. Summary execution 11. Pillage 12. Rape, sexual slavery, forced prostitution or forced pregnancy There is a big difference between ruthlessly commanding people to kill men, women, children and infants out of some sick, twisted, maniachal killing spree and the measures used by the Allies during WWII to defend freedom and democracy and protect those who could not protect themselves. Did we utterly wipe out all the Germans? Did we utterly wipe out all the Japanese? And what did we do after these wars? The US rebuilt these countries and restored their land and their freedoms as well as helping to rebuild their economies. BTW I am not a big advocate of all the conflicts the US has gotten into during its history, some were avoidable through peaceful/diplomatic means in my opinion (i.e. WWI, Vietnam, etc). Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given. Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given. For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. Dr. Carl Sagan
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Mespo Member (Idle past 2905 days) Posts: 158 From: Mesopotamia, Ohio, USA Joined: |
Nice posts, DevilsAdvocate...
...and Peg, if you're reading... I did not CHOOSE to be in Vietnam, or fight a war either. Although my cirucmstances were more a matter of timing than choice. (i.e. Gulf of Tonkin incident while I was in navy boot camp. "Vietnam is where, Chief?") Anyway, to get to my point. I don't think mankind can stand the though of prolonged peace. Just think of it. No Armageddon. Instead, Universal Peace breaks out and there is a tremendous world-wide party. And then it slowly dawns on people that the same saints, sinners, bravehearts and bastards that were there yesterday are still there today and will be tomorrow. God DID NOT kill the people you hate. As a matter of fact, God didn't do ANYTHING!!. And it gets worse. You have to be responsible for your own words and deeds. You have to take responsibility for your own actions. God doesn't descend from a cloud and kick the ass of the bully down the street. Or the bully in the next city, or country or religion. OH WOE, poor Humankind! What to do? What to do? Where is Dick Cheney when you need him? BTW, Peg - I'm not a biblical scholar, but I don't remember Jesus riding into Jerusalem in a Roman war chariot. I think his message had something more to do with love and peace. So, who am I to argue with the Big Kahuna? (:raig
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Blue Jay Member (Idle past 2718 days) Posts: 2843 From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts Joined: |
Hi, Mespo.
You've got an interesting thought. So, would you suspect that the widespread belief that God will take care of the wicked is currently preventing a lot of fundamentalists from trying to take care of the wicked themselves? Maybe, in some strange way, belief in Armageddon is having a positive effect? I'm Bluejay. Darwin loves you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
bluescat48 Member (Idle past 4210 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: |
as a person yourself who chose to fight a war, you no doubt did so because you believed it was the only way to accomplish some sort of peace? Most military people don't fight wars because they want to, but because they are ordered to a war zone. The military is not a democracy. Soldiers can't pick & choose whether they want to fight or not. I fought in Vietnam, not because I agreed with the war, but as a US citizen, I was obligated to fight. There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Agobot Member (Idle past 5550 days) Posts: 786 Joined: |
bluescat writes: Most military people don't fight wars because they want to, but because they are ordered to a war zone. The military is not a democracy. Soldiers can't pick & choose whether they want to fight or not. I fought in Vietnam, not because I agreed with the war, but as a US citizen, I was obligated to fight. I wonder how the religious folks act in such military circumstances. Maybe you have some memories - how does it feel for a theist to hmmm, how do i say this, send someone(a Vietnamese) to heaven by a gunshot, whereby breaking the will of God and the 10 commandmants? You may choose not to answer and sorry if this brings back nasty memories.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
bluescat48 Member (Idle past 4210 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: |
I wonder how the religious folks act in such military circumstances. Maybe you have some memories - how does it feel for a theist to hmmm, how do i say this, send someone(a Vietnamese) to heaven by a gunshot, whereby breaking the will of God and the 10 commandmants? You may choose not to answer and sorry if this brings back nasty memories. I never encountered anyone who even thought of sending someone to heaven or breaking the the will of God. The word was survival. If I was being shot at my thinking was to survive which meant shoot back. The moral aspect never enters. There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
I'm proposing the same thing for Armageddon. It's going to happen simply because Humans imagine it will. They are fixated on it, therefore it *will* happen. Prophecies of such an event has been prophesied for millinia, including the prophet Daniel, centuries BC for the latter day messianic period. These prophecies all corroborate events required to happen before Armageddon. Over the centuries, ignorant wolf criers have ignored the requirements for Armageddon and have failed to discern the signs ofthe times. Jesus himself, in Matthew 24, Mark 11 and Luke 21 corroborated OT prophets by specifying that Jerusalem would be occupied by Gentile nations until Gentile occupation ended and Jews returned. That prophecy had to be fulfilled before Armageddon. That prophecy of Jesus was fulfilled in the 1967 six day war when Jews replaced Gentiles in occupation of the city. But that's not all. The prophet John corroborated with OT prophets and Jesus to go into detail other specifics leading up to Armageddon; things like numbers and marks for global monetary as is emerging, drought, climate change events, fiery disastrous events, nations drawn into the Middle Eastern nations threatening Israel's right to exist, signs in the sky, etc, etc. So, Killinghurts, hang onto your hat and side with the Jesus Armageddon band wagon. It's not talk that brings on Armageddon. It's frightful things like the invention of explosives, fast travel, global government, cashless currency and all of that wonderful phenomena that brings on Armageddon as per the prophets of old, not current Armageddon jargon emerging from the mouths of Christians. BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Mespo Member (Idle past 2905 days) Posts: 158 From: Mesopotamia, Ohio, USA Joined: |
things like numbers and marks for global monetary as is emerging.. What a concept, Buzsaw!! You mean if I have an image of Armageddon engraved on my Capital One card, I can expedite the Final Conflict? Yowzaa! (:raig
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Mespo Member (Idle past 2905 days) Posts: 158 From: Mesopotamia, Ohio, USA Joined: |
Hi Mantis,
So, would you suspect that the widespread belief that God will take care of the wicked is currently preventing a lot of fundamentalists from trying to take care of the wicked themselves? Maybe, in some strange way, belief in Armageddon is having a positive effect? In some ways, belief in Armageddon is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, God will punish that big bully that stole my school lunch money, so I don't have to do anything. On the other hand, God will EVENTUALLY punish that big bully, but in the meantime, how much lunch money am I going to let that bully steal? Maybe I better do something about it, now. It's all about HOPE, I think. Both in a positive and negative connotation. HOWEVER (he continued...) the whole Aramageddon schtick has to be reconciled with what Jesus said in the Beatitudes. Since the Sermon on the Mount came straight from the horses's mouth (Sorry Jesus), and the Armageddon story came from John, who had been exiled for umpteen years, had a bad case of hemorrhoids and lack-o-nookie, then who are you going to believe? My money is on the guy preaching on the hill side who served fish and chips afterwards. (:raig
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17825 Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
quote: That would be the Daniel who said that the End Times would occur in the latter days of the Hellenistic kingdoms (Daniel 8:20-26).
quote: Jesus says no such thing in Mark 11 - or Mark 13, which you probably meant. Nor does he in the parallel passages in Matthew 24.
quote:The Revelation doesn't predict "numbers or marks for global monetary[sic]". Most of the rest is pretty dodgy too,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DevilsAdvocate Member (Idle past 3122 days) Posts: 1548 Joined: |
I wonder how the religious folks act in such military circumstances. Maybe you have some memories - how does it feel for a theist to hmmm, how do i say this, send someone(a Vietnamese) to heaven by a gunshot, whereby breaking the will of God and the 10 commandmants? You may choose not to answer and sorry if this brings back nasty memories. I have not been in a direct one on one gunfight in a wartime situation but over a decade ago I had had my finger on the button to send several Iranian gunboats who were threatening my ship in the northern Persian Gulf to their doom. However, from my experience I don't think anyone in the military in this type of situation is thinking of whether we are sending people to heaven or hell at that frantic, adreniline-motivated moment in time. Instead we doing everything in our power to remain calm, think clearly and to try to ensure our survival in this encounter. I may be wrong but this is how I felt. Only after the fact did I flashback and think back about the more grandiose ramifications of my actions such as how many people I could have killed, if they had families, etc. BTW at the time I was a staunch Bible-thumping Christian. My honest opinion is that when your life or the life of someone you love is threatened the last thing you think about is religion or any other philosophical musings. When adrenaline kicks in your body regresses back to its animal-like primal behaviors (much like when we turn off our brain and rely totally on our primal urges and emotions i.e. sex, starvation, fear, fight or flight, etc) and we usually have to force ourselves think as rational law-abiding human beings. Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given. For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. Dr. Carl Sagan
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024