Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,753 Year: 4,010/9,624 Month: 881/974 Week: 208/286 Day: 15/109 Hour: 4/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Speciation + Evolution = More Diversity
onifre
Member (Idle past 2976 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 35 of 47 (493893)
01-11-2009 1:54 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by RAZD
01-07-2009 8:26 PM


Re: Evolution after Speciation
Hi RAZD,
I have a couple of questions. Hope they are not too stupid- lol
After speciation has occurred, the daughter populations no longer share genes through reproduction, and they are free to evolve completely different traits.
What actually drives speciation...?
You wrote,
quote:
the species forms a band made up of several varieties around some barrier to their survival ability,
Could you give a more laymen explanation, please?
Does this mean the species know which members within their group are better suited for survival and they hangout together insuring a better success rate? Like some elitist group of birds weeding out lesser members, eventually leading to a parent/daughter population split?
If that is right, my next question would be, wouldn't that almost guarantee the parent populations extinction, since it's a split of better suited species from their lesser suited kin?
Also, you wrote,
quote:
when they meet on the other side of the barrier, the two ends do not mate.
Cannot mate or choose not to mate due to selective reproduction?
That should be enough for starters. There is more to discuss about where change occurs, but this is long enough for now.
I hope when you're done weeding out the creationist babel you can continue with a more detailed explanations, thanks for another great thread.
- Oni

"I smoke pot. If this bothers anyone, I suggest you look around at the world in which we live and shut your mouth."--Bill Hicks
"I never knew there was another option other than to question everything"--Noam Chomsky

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by RAZD, posted 01-07-2009 8:26 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by NosyNed, posted 01-11-2009 2:45 PM onifre has replied
 Message 38 by RAZD, posted 01-11-2009 3:30 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2976 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 40 of 47 (493940)
01-11-2009 8:22 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by NosyNed
01-11-2009 2:45 PM


Re: speciation drivers
Hi Ned,
It used to be thought that only if a population was separated geographically could a speciation event occur. This is called "allopatric" speciation. In this case it might be "driven" by lots of things. Great distance might do it if the genes can not flow easily throughout the range. Note the ring-species case: if part of the ring is killed off (by whatever) then there are two (or more) separated populations. Once that is true the the accumulating changes to the now separate gene pools will eventually (and this appears to take perhaps, millions of years for mammals) will be completely incompatible. (E.g., lions and tigers have been separated for that kind of time and are nearly completely separate).
We now know that many things can drive speciation. E.g., there is a parasite of (I think) fruit flies (don't remember too well) that changes them so only infected animals can breed with each other. It is an immediate separation of populations. There have been cases (many in plants, fewer in animals) where a chromosome number change separates the populations. This can produce nearly "instantaneous" speciation.
A mutation changing something like a birds song can cause a separation of a population into those without is and those with it.
So basically what you're saying is not only can the environment cause speciation, but, the species itself can create conditions that drive them to speciation. Ok. I thought only environmental adaptation was the 'driving' force.
No. They don't "know". Some survive some don't.
Didn't phrase it properly. The lesser adapted species are weeded out by ONLY natural selection or by sexual selection as well?
It may be that the disruption is by a environmental change (a big city appearing?) in the home range of the parent sub-species and it goes extinct or it maybe that the range is disrupted enough to reduce the gene flow to very, very low levels.
Say then that the disruption causes A and X or A and Y to co-exist now in the same environment, would that force the 2 to eventually mate again, perhaps spawning off a new species. Or will one of them have to go?
Take your lion/tiger example. Say some sort of environmental change causes these two daughter species to co-exist. There will definitely be competition for food. So, would one have to take out the other?
It is possible to have a speciation event and have both parent and daughter populations do just fine in the same area.
Well, an environmental change that causes speciation could not give both equal survival rates, right?
If we can't get interested then we can't mate.
Cool. Makes sense.
Thanks Ned.

"I smoke pot. If this bothers anyone, I suggest you look around at the world in which we live and shut your mouth."--Bill Hicks
"I never knew there was another option other than to question everything"--Noam Chomsky

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by NosyNed, posted 01-11-2009 2:45 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2976 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 41 of 47 (493942)
01-11-2009 9:08 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by RAZD
01-11-2009 3:30 PM


Re: Evolution after Speciation - review
Hi RAZD,
Quick answer - evolution:
But as Ned noted, speciation can occur by a mutation to the species, or some other cause, like his parasite in the fruit fly example. I figured that the species would evolve, but I meant more along the lines of, is this solely driven by environmental changes or can the species itself cause conditions to seperate?
As Ned noted, both, but, a non-environmental speciation isn't covered in the links you gave me...
quote:
Speciation often begins when a single species becomes geographically separated into two populations. Individuals cannot travel between the populations, preventing the two populations from interbreeding.
...so is it both or not?
It is not unusual for a species to inhabit several ecologies, making partial adaptations to each. If there is sufficient separation between ecologies, they can form hybrid zones in between pockets of relatively stable ecologies. The populations in those pockets will tend to adapt specifically to that pocket ecology, even though they can still share gene flow through the hybrid zones, eventually around to the other varieties.
There is also an effect called the "Wallace Effect" (Alfred Russel Wallace was the "other" Darwin ... and is sometimes called the "father of biogeography": the "Wallace Line" is also named after him):
quote:
He suggested the following scenario. When two varieties of a species had diverged beyond a certain point, each adapted to particular conditions, hybrid offspring would be less well adapted than either parent form. At that point natural selection will tend to eliminate the hybrids.
According to this hybrid species will be eliminated. But as with the question I asked Ned, if 2 daughter species find themselves having to co-exist, would that cause one of the two to be eliminated?
Note that this means that a species in a stable environment will tend to select for the most average phenotype, and thus stay relatively the same from generation to generation
Sexual selection...?
Depends on how you view extinction: they continue in each daughter population. Now it may be possible for an intermediate daughter population to go extinct, could even be due to competition from the end varieties if they overlap far enough, and that would de facto leave the remaining varieties - the ones that don't interbreed - as new species.
When you say intermediate, would this be a the hybrid type, that will be selected against?
Yes. It doesn't matter as the result is the same: the daughter populations no longer share mutations by gene flow, and thus diverge from generation to generation.
Ok.
I don't have too much trouble with creationist babel comments that discuss the topic, only when they try to move the topic to something else or dodge the issues.
It seems like that's all they do. I've been waiting for this thread to take off since I had so much interest in it. It kept getting held up with deviating "comments".
Biostratigraphy takes the relative age relationships of layers, by the principle of superposition, and then finds the fossils that show the succession of life from generation to generation, from layer to layer, and looks for fossils that are specific to a single layer to then use as an "index fossil" to compare ages of layers in other locations.
Except that I want to turn it around and look at the original stratigraphic data points that establish the lineage of the fossils in time. I want to find the succession of forms of life in the different layers, as was done for Pelycodus above, extending further than a single speciation event. Strato-biology anyone?
We know from Pelycodus that as species evolve over time that they become different from their ancestors, and at some point reach sufficient difference that we poor humans need to arbitrarily divide them into different species to discuss those differences.
This would also occur after speciation, and because there is no sharing of genes\mutations\hereditary traits between the two new species that each will go through this process in different ways.
The questions are: how far does this divergence go, and how fast does it get there?
I wish you success in this, sorry, don't know shit about it. But, I will ask you questions when you figure it out.
Just a question that maybe along the lines of what you're looking for, wouldn't you say that there is no end to the divergence until something occurs to the species?

"I smoke pot. If this bothers anyone, I suggest you look around at the world in which we live and shut your mouth."--Bill Hicks
"I never knew there was another option other than to question everything"--Noam Chomsky

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by RAZD, posted 01-11-2009 3:30 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by NosyNed, posted 01-11-2009 11:44 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2976 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 43 of 47 (493969)
01-12-2009 7:30 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by NosyNed
01-11-2009 11:44 PM


Re: Evolution after Speciation - review
Once it is split then mutations will happen differently to the two pools. Moreover, even if the same mutation occurs in both pools it may be selected for in one pool and against in the other.
Ok, now im getting it.
On what I think are rare occasions a common mutation to a few individuals can split them off instantly.
Wouldn't it require that the mutation be in a large portion of the population before a split into parent/daughter can occur?
You did say rare, im just wondering how rare?
Again: It depends. Over and over this will be the answer.
Noted. I think im understand why, too many variables, right?
But if the split happens because they occupy slightly different niches then no both may survive in close proximity.
Cool.
Thanks again Ned,
- Oni

"I smoke pot. If this bothers anyone, I suggest you look around at the world in which we live and shut your mouth."--Bill Hicks
"I never knew there was another option other than to question everything"--Noam Chomsky

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by NosyNed, posted 01-11-2009 11:44 PM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by RAZD, posted 01-12-2009 8:21 AM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2976 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 45 of 47 (494029)
01-12-2009 7:06 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by RAZD
01-12-2009 8:21 AM


Re: topic drift - please discuss speciation elsewhere
Either. Reproductive isolation has occurred and the two populations now reproduce and evolve independently.
Ok.
Not hybrid species, hybrid zones. It is still one species until isolation occurs. The zones will be eliminated as hybrids become less viable than either of the two daughter populations. As the numbers decrease the zones will cease to exist, completing the reproductive isolation of the two daughter populations.
Ok.
If you want to discuss speciation, I suggest a new thread.
I think I understand all of the variables now thanks to you and Ned so that won't be needed.
Thanks again,
- Oni

"I smoke pot. If this bothers anyone, I suggest you look around at the world in which we live and shut your mouth."--Bill Hicks
"I never knew there was another option other than to question everything"--Noam Chomsky

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by RAZD, posted 01-12-2009 8:21 AM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by RAZD, posted 01-12-2009 9:56 PM onifre has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024