that I am attacking science, scientists and objective thought.
What you are doing is attacking a stawman.
I believe If you have a theory, you test it.
Putting aside that ToE has been put to the test (as every good secondary school kid would know), what do you consider to be a good falsification of ToE?
Then until your theory is observed and proved,
Science does not deal in proof: you are thinking of maths.
Look Homunculus, it really seems that your perception of science is at odds with what science really is. Why do you think this is?
Even if it is held dear in your hearts.
Why do you think people do research? Supporting previous peoples work is much less fun that discovering something new.
Edited by Larni, : Spellink