divide that by 6 billion odd inhabitants and they get at least 6 acres of land each. That's a hell of a lot of land to live on... land that has the ability to produce food under the right conditions.
That would work if all the land was capable of sustaining life, without having to alter the land to make it habitable or not having to rely on bringing in needed supplies at an alarming rate. I cannot see areas such as the the Himalayas, the Sahara, The arctic tundra or other mountainous, desert or tundral areas ever able to become fully habitable without drastic measures. The logistics of the matter would be virtually impossible to allow each person his "6 acres."
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
™ Version 4.2
