Fossilization IS a rapid process. If an animal dies it will decompose before it is ever becomes fossilized.
This is nonsensical. If fossilization is so rapid then why is there not enough time for skeletons to fossilize? We have fossils! They exist!
it has been scientifically proven that ”fish’ decompose within no time; that is days.
Sure, given enough scavengers and bacteria, the soft tissue of any organism can easily be gotten rid of in days, but the don't eat bones. The skeleton usually gets scattered, which is why fossils are rare. No one is saying that fossils are created every time something dies. It requires very specific circumstances.
but sharks are fishes, so I am making an assumption that they also disintegrate very quickly; perhaps not as fast as say the fish in your fish tank will, but still very quickly.
Again, skeletons don't just disintegrate in a matter of days.
Furthermore in order for a shark to be buried it needs to be on the ground. When a shark dies it floats, just as any other fish.
First of all, your pet fish floats when it dies because there is still oxygen left in its swim bladder, a feature not found in sharks, so there's no guarantee that it would float when dead. Secondly, we were talking about shark teeth, not whole shark skeletons. So even if the shark's skeleton was scattered by scavengers, the teeth would still fall to the bottom of the ocean, were it would be quickly covered in sediment and then slowly fossilized.
If Noah's flood brought dirt up and covered everything to make fossils, then why are the types of fossils we find so skewed towards marine life? "most of the fossils we have are of marine organisms, which live on or in the ocean floor, or naturally sink to the floor when they die" (Why Evolution is True by J A Coyne) If Noah's flood did all the fossil making, then why don't land plants and animals have more representation in the fossil record?
The study of the natural world provides us with the results that support God and the associated biblical claims
Hmm, and yet the entire scientific community disagrees with this assertion.
If you want your answers please heed my advise; view the videos, that I provided and I am sure many if not all of your questions will be answered.
No, I want YOUR answers. I want you to be able to defend you argument. If you can't even paraphrase, then how can you even say you believe what you do? I'm not going to wade through hours of video making your case for you. I watched the first 10 minutes of the first video and it was intolerably inaccurate. There were dozens of misrepresentations and lies within that short bit alone.