I never suggested that scavengers eat teeth. I was saying that if an animal was to die, with a combination of scavengers, entropy and the elements the animal will be gone before it can be encased into a layer of sediment and fossilized.
You are, of course, wrong.
I wonder what you think entropy is?
Also that big paragraph you posted: Most of that consists of ”Academic Institutions’. What exactly the point of writing that? Just because an academy of science says something doesn’t make it true.
Right. The
facts make it true --- and scientists look at the facts. Unlike you.
Perhaps your argument was to suggest that since the majority of the academy of sciences support the ”evolution theory’ as doctrine, that makes it true. Well, science is about the study of the natural world, not supporting the majority’s interpretation.
Right. And these are the people who, unlike you, spend their lives in the study the natural world, and don't support creationism.
The fact that the many ”Academy of Sciences’ support and teach ”evolution’ proves that.
Petitio principii much?
Compare with the following analogous debate:
You: There are no skyscrapers in New York.
Me: Everyone who's ever
seen New York agrees that there are skyscrapers there.
You: Just because people who've seen New York say something doesn't make it true. The fact that they say there are skyscrapers in New York proves that.
Why don't you just stick your fingers in your ears and have done with it?
The study of the natural world provides us with the results that support God and the associated biblical claims. (Genesis creation account, Global Flood account, etc)
There's no point in reciting this garbage to
me; unlike you, I am familiar with the evidence. Save it for the kids. You might fool some of 'em.
You have never studied the natural world, have you? Scientists have. What
you have studied is dumb creationist propaganda. This is why everything you think you know about science is absurdly false.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.