|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Report discussion problems here: No.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member (Idle past 185 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
That guy's ranting ring a bell.
I think he may be the guy with a grudge about James Randi (he posted last year I recall). http://EvC Forum: YOUR FAITH!? -->EvC Forum: YOUR FAITH!? Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2316 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
His posting style reminded me of another poster, so I searched the forums and came up with this one:
http://EvC Forum: How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins-Myers Corp. -->EvC Forum: How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins-Myers Corp. VERY similar, plus the mab in his name could be a reference to mabus. In short, I think it's the same person. I hunt for the truth
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: |
Thanks for the research. The IP numbers are very similar - They are almost certainly the same person.
I have replied to his message, and have just edited in some further comments. He has replied to my message, which of course is a no-no in itself. In all, he's on pretty thin ice. NO REPLIES TO THIS MESSAGE, UNLESS YOUR MEMBER NAME STARTS WITH "ADMIN". Adminnemooseus
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2316 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
Here's the culprit:
http://EvC Forum: sweet224 Topic Index -->EvC Forum: sweet224 Topic Index Ban his ass! I hunt for the truth |
|||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1426 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
http://EvC Forum: A Creation Website For Children -->EvC Forum: A Creation Website For Children
I suggest deleting his links if he doesn't stick around.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2127 days) Posts: 6117 Joined: |
http://EvC Forum: the source of life -->EvC Forum: the source of life
This poster keeps insisting on using creationist or layman's terms in place of scientific terms after several cautions. He has brought no evidence to show why these incorrect terms should be used in place of the ones now used in science. This, in the Science Forum, seems to be trollish behavior. Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: |
Adminnemooseus, in message 4, writes: Another one that I predict will be a big mess. Per meeting standards for promotion, Homunculus's two new topics both left a lot to be desired. But it would have been a long messy battle to whip them into shape. Thus I turned into "Mr. Easy" and promoted them anyway. I consider these topics to really be "enter at your own risk" sort of things. Don't expect anything approaching a high quality debate. That's how I see it. Other admins may see it different. Adminnemooseus New Members should start HERE to get an understanding of what makes great posts. Report a problem etc. type topics:
Report Technical Problems Here: No. 1 Report Discussion Problems Here: No. 2 Thread Reopen Requests Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum Other useful links:
Forum Guidelines, [thread=-19,-112], [thread=-17,-45], [thread=-19,-337], [thread=-14,-1073] Admin writes:
It really helps moderators figure out if a topic is disintegrating because of general misbehavior versus someone in particular if the originally non-misbehaving members kept it that way. When everyone is prickly and argumentative and off-topic and personal then it's just too difficult to tell. We have neither infinite time to untie the Gordian knot, nor the wisdom of Solomon. There used to be a comedian who presented his ideas for a better world, and one of them was to arm everyone on the highway with little rubber dart guns. Every time you see a driver doing something stupid, you fire a little dart at his car. When a state trooper sees someone driving down the highway with a bunch of darts all over his car he pulls him over for being an idiot. Please make it easy to tell you apart from the idiots. Source
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2127 days) Posts: 6117 Joined: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Admin Director Posts: 13018 From: EvC Forum Joined: Member Rating: 1.9 |
Homunculus is misinformed on many topics, and he complicates this with resourceful and determined rebuttals. He also fits the common pattern of a relatively new member who quickly burns himself out. If he sticks around then we'll gradually increase the pressure on him to use correct terminology and get his facts straight, except in threads specifically designated for discussing such issues.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2316 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
I'm not sure if Agobot's supsension is entirely correct.
In this thread: http://EvC Forum: Confidence in evolutionary science -->EvC Forum: Confidence in evolutionary science He was asked by AdminNosy not to post again in reply to his message 15. Adminnosy's reply is number 20. Then AdminNosy replies to his message 18 and suspends him, saying he should've read his earlier message and not have posted again. I think it's a bit hard for someone to read a message that follows after the last post he made to this thread. I hunt for the truth
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: |
Admin noticed the situation even prior to your message, and lifted the suspension.
AdminNosy writes: (source) I misread the time on agobots last message. My apologies to him, thanks for correcting it. Adminnemooseus
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22480 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.8 |
I think Bertot may be having a bit of difficulty grasping the "summation time" concept over at Why so friggin' confident?.
--Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dr Jack Member Posts: 3514 From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch Joined: Member Rating: 8.4 |
I am peturbed by the style of debate going on in the the principles of world view thread. It seems to me that the Evo side have been overly hostile to John 10:10, and frequently approached the debate in a manner not conducive to productive debate, lines such as these:
quote: quote: quote: encourage a tone of debate that is highly adversarial and unlikely to proceed in a manner conducive to productive discussion. I would suggest that we will be more effective if we assume, or at least adopt the pretence of assuming, that John 10:10 (and other creationists) are intelligent, open minded, capable of understanding the arguments and evidence and here in good faith. And, further, attempt to avoid snideness, snarkiness and other tactics likely to drag the debate downwards. In particular, we should attempt to maintain these standards when debating with members who are relatively new to the site.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2316 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
There's also another problem I see in the thread. It's about the (supposed) effect evolution has on one's world view, not about wether evolution is true or not, which seems to be what John 10:10 is talking about.
I hunt for the truth
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2316 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
Here's the culprit: http://EvC Forum: CERN - Large Hadron Collider and the Very Early Universe -->EvC Forum: CERN - Large Hadron Collider and the Very Early Universe
Kick him in the nuts! Yeah! Harder! \ Seems he did a second post here: http://EvC Forum: The Axioms Of Scientific Investigation -->EvC Forum: The Axioms Of Scientific Investigation I think he wants to be kicked some more.... Edited by Huntard, : Added second psot I hunt for the truth |
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024