Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,873 Year: 4,130/9,624 Month: 1,001/974 Week: 328/286 Day: 49/40 Hour: 3/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Social and Religious Issues ⇒ Comparative Religions ⇒

Why "Immaterial Pink Unicorns" are not a logical argument

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why "Immaterial Pink Unicorns" are not a logical argument
lyx2no
Member (Idle past 4744 days)
Posts: 1277
From: A vast, undifferentiated plane.
Joined: 02-28-2008

Normal Thread Display
Message 35 of 304 (499951)
02-21-2009 3:06 PM 		Reply to: Message 34 by Rrhain
02-21-2009 3:02 PM

Totorial
Do you have a site where I can see what "B!->A" Means. I can figure out half of it myself but only half. Thanks.
​
Genesis 2
17 But of the ponderosa pine, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou shinniest thereof thou shalt sorely learn of thy nakedness.
18 And we all live happily ever after.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Rrhain, posted 02-21-2009 3:02 PM Rrhain has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Rrhain, posted 02-21-2009 5:06 PM lyx2no has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024