string writes:
Stile, have you read my original post?
Yes.
However, because the Bible says that the earth was created on the first day, it must have occurred in a different reality.
Why? Maybe the Bible is just wrong and it never occured anything like what is described in the Bible at all. This way there is no need for a different reality, or for the Bible to be true.
I can only convince you that my theory is correct if you ask relevant questions regarding my concepts.
I thought I did.
I thought "your concept" was that the Bible is "correct", but not "literally true." And that you had an accident, and a meeting with Jesus Christ, and then you were informed about a different reality where the entire Bible is correct and also literally true. It's just that the Bible isn't literally true for our reality.
Is that wrong?
Assuming that was right, my question was:
What if I don't think there really is another reality?
What if I think the Bible isn't "literally true" for our reality just because it's simply wrong... a mistake?
What are you going to show me to ease my mind into taking your theory seriously?
Or... would you like to assume that Jesus Christ actually exists, and that the Bible is actually from God and from there start to see if your theory has any logical troubles?
Are you wondering if what Jesus Christ told you when you had your accident is actually a part of reality?
Or are you wondering if this theory you're talking about can logically exist alongside Jesus Christ of the Bible? That the rest of the Bible, given the existence of a different reality, is still all literally true for that different reality, even though it is not literally true in our current reality?
I don't think I'm ready for your "entire work," I'm still stumbling over the basics. The foundation, even.