But did you know that these cells really no longer fit the definition of a biological cell? In fact they are dead!
Please supply any documentation that says these cells do not fit the definition of a biological cell.
Why would the lack of a nuclei mean the cell is dead? Since it can not create new cells means it is dead?
Science has determined how the red blood cells are created by the body to have no nuclei.
Here is some science.
Losing the nucleus enables the red blood cell to contain more oxygen-carrying hemoglobin, thus enabling more oxygen to be transported in the blood and boosting our metabolism.
His cell-culture system began with red blood cell precursors drawn from an embryonic mouse liver (in mammalian embryos, the liver is the main producer of such cells, rather than bone marrow as in adults). The cultured cells, synchronized to develop together, divided four or five times before losing their nuclei and becoming immature red blood cells.
During normal cell division, each daughter cell receives half the DNA, comments Lodish. In this case, when the red blood cell divides, one daughter cell gets all the DNA. What’s fascinating is that in this case, that daughter cell gets eaten by macrophages. Until now, scientists were unable to study these cells because they were unable to see them.
Unless you can validate the premise of your argument, then you have no argument at all.
Facts do not have an agenda. Facts are just Facts.