Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

Creation science II

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creation science II
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3

Normal Thread Display
Message 104 of 207 (502179)
03-10-2009 9:03 AM 		Reply to: Message 103 by Kelly
03-10-2009 8:52 AM

To be a misconception it has to be wrong
The trouble, Kelly, is that Creationists have shown no sign of actually doing that. They're not doing experiments, formulating detailed hypothesises, making predictions.
​
If you think they are, you need to show us some examples of when they've actually done that; we're not going to just take your word for it.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by Kelly, posted 03-10-2009 8:52 AM Kelly has not replied
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3

Normal Thread Display
Message 123 of 207 (502246)
03-10-2009 1:14 PM 		Reply to: Message 122 by NosyNed
03-10-2009 1:14 PM

Re: LIAR
It's the subtitle to the post, Ned.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by NosyNed, posted 03-10-2009 1:14 PM NosyNed has not replied
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3

Normal Thread Display
Message 144 of 207 (502347)
03-11-2009 9:14 AM 		Reply to: Message 143 by Percy
03-11-2009 8:40 AM

Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable
Percy writes:
​
The paper scrupulously describes the painstaking scientific methods used to gather, preserve and analyze the samples.
​
Actually, and this is a key point, it doesn't. It describe in intricate details various methods used to ensure the sample was properly processed in the lab, but it doesn't describe the method for gathering the sample, or the means by which it has been preserved, it only says:
​
quote:
In July 1947, a small piece of coalified wood measuring almost 3 centimeters in length (Figure 2), was found in a "sand bed"
  —Snelling
This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by Percy, posted 03-11-2009 8:40 AM Percy has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024