Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9078 total)
96 online now:
vimesey (1 member, 95 visitors)
Newest Member: harveyspecter
Post Volume: Total: 895,059 Year: 6,171/6,534 Month: 364/650 Week: 134/278 Day: 2/30 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Interesting find on Wikileaks...
BVZ
Member (Idle past 4805 days)
Posts: 36
Joined: 08-20-2008


Message 1 of 6 (503248)
03-17-2009 1:47 AM


Here is the link: Censored New Scientist article: How to spot a hidden religious agenda

It seems that New Scientists was sued for libel, and they had to take the article down. Reading the article, I could not find anything inacurate in it.

I find it interesting that someone would take offence at something that does not contain any inacuracies.

What do you guys think?

Edited by Admin, : Shorten long link.


Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Admin, posted 03-17-2009 5:57 AM BVZ has not replied
 Message 4 by Son, posted 03-17-2009 6:22 AM BVZ has not replied
 Message 5 by Larni, posted 03-17-2009 7:58 AM BVZ has not replied
 Message 6 by Huntard, posted 03-17-2009 8:12 AM BVZ has not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12814
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.4


Message 2 of 6 (503264)
03-17-2009 5:57 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by BVZ
03-17-2009 1:47 AM


For me, the link you provided is to a webpage that says that they've removed the article on the advice of their lawyers. Did you read the article in the print edition?

Anyway, I found the article in the print edition and used a couple phrases from it to find a copy that had been posted on the web over at a Google group called Atheism vs Christianity:

How to spot a hidden religious agenda

In the print edition the title was Hidden religious agendas and how to spot them.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by BVZ, posted 03-17-2009 1:47 AM BVZ has not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12814
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.4


Message 3 of 6 (503267)
03-17-2009 5:57 AM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
Son
Member (Idle past 3144 days)
Posts: 346
From: France,Paris
Joined: 03-11-2009


Message 4 of 6 (503269)
03-17-2009 6:22 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by BVZ
03-17-2009 1:47 AM


I've just read the article and i just can't see what is libelous about it from a legal point of view. Maybe some creationists or Idist could tell us what's wrong with this article.

On another related note,I wonder why creationists pays so much for lawyers instead of research. Maybe they would get more results and publications in scientific journals if they didn't spend most of their money in courts.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by BVZ, posted 03-17-2009 1:47 AM BVZ has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 16 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 5 of 6 (503273)
03-17-2009 7:58 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by BVZ
03-17-2009 1:47 AM


I read the article, too (while my girlfriend was doing the shopping) and I can't remember anything you could call libel.

Seemed like common sense to me.

Makes me wonder why they bother doing this if their ideas are sound and can stand up to scrutiny.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by BVZ, posted 03-17-2009 1:47 AM BVZ has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 1609 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 6 of 6 (503277)
03-17-2009 8:12 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by BVZ
03-17-2009 1:47 AM


What a coincidence. I watched the Atheist Experience's new show yesterday, and they brought this up too, though i don't recall them saying it was censored.

The show:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6226935465828134733


I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by BVZ, posted 03-17-2009 1:47 AM BVZ has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022