Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,581 Year: 2,838/9,624 Month: 683/1,588 Week: 89/229 Day: 0/61 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Age Correlations and an Old Earth: Version 1 No 3 (formerly Part III)
JonF
Member (Idle past 158 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 351 of 357 (503640)
03-20-2009 8:56 PM
Reply to: Message 350 by Daniel4140
03-20-2009 8:47 PM


Re: Why do they correlate?
The alleged problem,overs only the very end of the Suigetsu data. I.e. not particularly relevant; assuming that Woody's correctly representing the data (probably a poor assumption, based on past experience) than there's still 33,000 years of correlation to be explained. And correlation with tree rings and ice cores and ...
Focusing on one item is the wrong thing to do. It's standard creationist practice, but it's still wrong. You need a meta-analysis that explains the observed multiple correlations.
{ABE} Another reason to suspect Woody's misrepresenting is his misrepresetnations earlier in the articlee, e.g. his repetition of the Ngauruhoe and Mt. St. Helens dacite and "fossil wood" frauds.
Edited by JonF, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 350 by Daniel4140, posted 03-20-2009 8:47 PM Daniel4140 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 352 by Daniel4140, posted 03-20-2009 9:21 PM JonF has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024