Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   "Macro" vs "Micro" genetic "kind" mechanism?
subbie
Member (Idle past 1254 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 244 of 248 (503994)
03-23-2009 10:18 PM
Reply to: Message 243 by Sky-Writing
03-23-2009 10:14 PM


quote:
If Darwin was correct, there would be no NEED for a fossil record. There would be AT LEAST ONE complete living series of transitional forms.
Please explain exactly why you believe this is a necessary consequence of Darwinian evolution, because nobody who studies it seems to agree with you, and I'd like to tell them why they are wrong.

For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and non-believers. -- Barack Obama
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 243 by Sky-Writing, posted 03-23-2009 10:14 PM Sky-Writing has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024