Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,446 Year: 3,703/9,624 Month: 574/974 Week: 187/276 Day: 27/34 Hour: 8/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationists Cannot Define "Kind".
anglagard
Member (Idle past 858 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 64 of 69 (504024)
03-24-2009 2:39 AM
Reply to: Message 63 by Sarawak
03-24-2009 12:26 AM


Sarawak writes:
I have been asking for a definition of kind for over 20 years, and, as with this thread, I have yet to get one.
I guess it means that there is none. It doesn't make any real difference. Every genome sequence confirms some evolutionary relationship. There is no Creation "Scientist" with sufficient background and knowledge to define "kind" in a way that will hold up to scientific data.
You forgot one thing beyond a background and knowledge, namely a commitment to the truth.
Edited by anglagard, : clarity

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis Bacon
The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by Sarawak, posted 03-24-2009 12:26 AM Sarawak has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024