Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,397 Year: 3,654/9,624 Month: 525/974 Week: 138/276 Day: 12/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Jehovas Witness Bible, any exclusive contradictions?
anglagard
Member (Idle past 857 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 61 of 64 (493111)
01-06-2009 6:32 AM
Reply to: Message 60 by Peg
01-06-2009 6:00 AM


Peg writes:
anastasia you seem to know the trinity well
could you provide the scriptural basis for the teaching?
Especially anything that Jesus said about it seeing he would have been talking about himself, he should know it pretty well.
I don't think you will be getting a response as Anastasia is no longer active in this forum.
Back in the old days when people here used chat, she said that she had to take a vacation due to health problems.
I for one, while not necessarily agreeing with everything she had to say, found her to be very intelligent and understanding of different viewpoints.
I miss her input and miss the informal conversation that once was a part of this forum.

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis Bacon
The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Peg, posted 01-06-2009 6:00 AM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4950 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 62 of 64 (500114)
02-23-2009 4:31 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Phat
12-08-2006 10:48 AM


Re: David Reed is a place to start.
Phat writes:
The translation about the Word being God or the word being a god!
its in line with the text of the original greek Septuagint
'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with ton the~on,and the Word was theos'
in this verse there are two forms of the Greek noun for God (theos)
the first is preceded by ton 'the' is the definite article... the second instance has no definite article and the rule in Greek language is that if both have definite articles then they are the same, but if not, then they are two separate things being spoken of.
As an example, 1 John 1:5 "God ho the-os is light phos"
in essence its saying 'The God is light'
if light was preceeded by a definite article, it would read 'The God is The Light'
Also in John 2:24 'God is a Spirit'
1John 4:16 'God is love'
God is preceeded by a definite article, but spirit and love are not. So we can say that God has the attributes of spirit & love, but Spirit & Love are not God.
Its unfortunate that most translators have allowed their theological ideas to be the driving force in their translations rather then just relaying the word for the way it was written.
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Phat, posted 12-08-2006 10:48 AM Phat has not replied

  
Daniel4140
Member (Idle past 5504 days)
Posts: 61
Joined: 03-05-2009


Message 63 of 64 (502589)
03-12-2009 12:55 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Neutralmind
12-08-2006 9:14 AM


Jehovah's Witnesses Chronology
If I am not mistaken, JW's have a unique and provably incorrect chronology of the Neo Babylonian Empire. I don't have a JW bible, but if they are like other editions, they might have put some of the dates in the margin.

Creation 4140 B.C. Flood 2484 B.C
Exodus 1632 B.C. Online Chronology book: The Scroll of Biblical Chronology

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Neutralmind, posted 12-08-2006 9:14 AM Neutralmind has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by Peg, posted 03-30-2009 2:36 AM Daniel4140 has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4950 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 64 of 64 (504504)
03-30-2009 2:36 AM
Reply to: Message 63 by Daniel4140
03-12-2009 12:55 PM


Re: Jehovah's Witnesses Chronology
Daniel4140 writes:
If I am not mistaken, JW's have a unique and provably incorrect chronology of the Neo Babylonian Empire. I don't have a JW bible, but if they are like other editions, they might have put some of the dates in the margin.
in what way do they have a Babylonian chronology??? In what context are you referring to?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by Daniel4140, posted 03-12-2009 12:55 PM Daniel4140 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024