A Designer Consistent with the Physical Evidence

quote:

---

Just a simple question.

​

In a thread dealing with "Intelligent Design" how is it that you are posting so much about religious belief?

​

I haven't followed the whole thread, but I pop into a thread in "Science Forums" and in "Intelligent Design" subforum and find nothing but statements regarding religious belief.

​

Is this all that intelligent design really is? Religion in disguise?

​

If not, how is it that the proponents of intelligent design always seem to fall back upon religious belief as their support?

---

Sadly, it would seem that many people are attracted to the label of intelligent design without fully understanding what it means.

Why exactly does this imply that the intelligent design movement as a whole is derived from creationist roots? I can perhaps agree that FTE changed from a creationist organization to advocating ID. However, this hardly implies that the movement as a whole is creationist. Michael Behe was a christian both before and after he rejected evolution. In fact, he currently advocates a set of beliefs that are very anti-creationist. Berlinski was, and still is, an agnostic.Edited by Fallen, : changing the quote tags

I posted a new topic.