"jedpTus rmathefoionhatwj aitustumheinreisgtone ecaeI ustblb", it doesn't actually mean anything does it.
Yes it does: We’ve got Jed, us, mat, math, at, the, he, ion, on, hat, another at; must be important, it; a descriptive you actually applied to it; (Is this code self-aware?), another us’ (Is it initiating first contact?), tu (In French?), he, in, is ( To be more evidence of awareness?), to, ton (Standardization interest in commerce?) and "tone". Your failure to recognize the information doesn’t mean it isn’t there. See if you can jumble it up where I can’t get information out of it.
"The information that was there is gone because I just jumbled it up".
The presupposed information, the information you wanted it to have, is partially lost. (What do you want to bet the NSA could retrieve it?)
The same principle applies in respect to information on the DNA code.
Agreed.
Genesis 2
17 But of the ponderosa pine, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou shinniest thereof thou shalt sorely learn of thy nakedness.
18 And we all live happily ever after.
™ Version 4.2
