Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,331 Year: 3,588/9,624 Month: 459/974 Week: 72/276 Day: 0/23 Hour: 0/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Creation/Evolution Miscellany ⇒

Among Scientists, How Broad is Concensus?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Among Scientists, How Broad is Concensus?
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4208 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 21 of 27 (507343)
05-03-2009 10:57 PM 		Reply to: Message 16 by Trev777
05-03-2009 5:12 PM

Re: Mistakes, distortions and lies
the evidence for a young earth is growing
​
So provide some. And not some biblical passage, some concrete evidence that has not be refuted 1000 times (PRATT).
​
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
​
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
​
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Trev777, posted 05-03-2009 5:12 PM Trev777 has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Trev777, posted 05-04-2009 6:05 PM bluescat48 has replied
  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4208 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 25 of 27 (507405)
05-04-2009 6:20 PM 		Reply to: Message 23 by Trev777
05-04-2009 6:05 PM

Re: Mistakes, distortions and lies
Go to the followingEvC Forum: Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1for my response as as AdminNosy brought out this is off topic.
​
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
​
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
​
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Trev777, posted 05-04-2009 6:05 PM Trev777 has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024