Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,435 Year: 3,692/9,624 Month: 563/974 Week: 176/276 Day: 16/34 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why is the Intelligent Designer so inept?
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 2 of 352 (478085)
08-11-2008 7:41 PM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 227 of 352 (507171)
05-02-2009 1:17 PM
Reply to: Message 226 by traderdrew
05-02-2009 12:30 PM


support your claim
I don't think some of you want to read it. I will let those who are really interested in seeing both sides of the debate read it.
You made a claim. Support it or withdraw it. You are very wrong, those who disagree with you really do want to know what you have to say. Don't hide.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 226 by traderdrew, posted 05-02-2009 12:30 PM traderdrew has not replied

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 262 of 352 (507589)
05-06-2009 3:25 PM
Reply to: Message 261 by traderdrew
05-06-2009 3:15 PM


Where's the Beef?
Your post doesn't answer Percy's points at all. You need to actually deal with what he posts and show why they are wrong not just say they are.
Have another go at it, k?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 261 by traderdrew, posted 05-06-2009 3:15 PM traderdrew has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 263 by traderdrew, posted 05-06-2009 3:26 PM AdminNosy has replied

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 264 of 352 (507591)
05-06-2009 3:31 PM
Reply to: Message 263 by traderdrew
05-06-2009 3:26 PM


apology?
I don't think there is anything to exactly apologize for (other than you and I have between us wasted (so far) 1 % of the posts this thread will be allowed).
You just need to go a bit slower and take the time to organize your thoughts and your rebuttals to points made.
The core of Percy's response is the larger paragraph commenting on the talkorigins article that you referenced. You never touched on that. It is possible that the correct thing for you to do is simply say you were wrong and withdraw what you said before or post something else to support your original claim.
Some of the rest of his post was guilty of the same heinous crime as yours but at least he had meat in his post as well.
Edited by AdminNosy, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 263 by traderdrew, posted 05-06-2009 3:26 PM traderdrew has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 266 by traderdrew, posted 05-06-2009 4:08 PM AdminNosy has not replied

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 271 of 352 (507624)
05-06-2009 8:18 PM
Reply to: Message 269 by traderdrew
05-06-2009 7:47 PM


do it yourself
You are required to bring the argument here in your own words. Quote the relevant part of what you are referencing and give your reasons why you think it applies.
Thank you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 269 by traderdrew, posted 05-06-2009 7:47 PM traderdrew has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024