OLD writes:
A mosaic book which examines the causes of life and death by cobbling various scientific investigations into an unmistakable conclusion: Charles Darwin and creationist prove to be both right and the same.
Cobbling together a selection of scientific investigations into a mosaic only produces a mistakeable conclusion.
OLD writes:
By embracing Darwin's work, studying it and determining its limits of application, we are left with a firm understanding of evolution (origin of species).
The comfort is in the embracing, understanding evolution is an oxymoron.
OLD writes:
Evolution provides no answers or scientific explanation for the origin of life and death.
Darwin provides no answers to anything, just conjecture.
OLD writes:
The answer to this question places evolution and creationism on the same track. This book reveals their co-existence with an enormity of sceintific fact.
On the same track? Evolution requires life from death and Creationism requires death from life. It might be the same track but its traversed in opposing directions.
One point you made, however irrational your book, is that life is different from non-life. How is a strand of DNA in a living Ecoli bacterium different than a strand of DNA in a dead bacterium?
There no doubt exist natural laws, but once this fine reason of ours was corrupted, it corrupted everything.
blz paskal