Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9072 total)
70 online now:
AZPaul3, dwise1, PaulK (3 members, 67 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Post Volume: Total: 893,152 Year: 4,264/6,534 Month: 478/900 Week: 2/182 Day: 2/28 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   "cdesign proponentsists" (Fallen and subbie only)
Junior Member (Idle past 4503 days)
Posts: 26
From: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Joined: 11-23-2008

Message 3 of 8 (509419)
05-21-2009 12:12 PM

Sigh. More awful attempts at thinly veiled Christian apologetics.

Riddle me this. If ID theory doesn't imply that there was a CREATOR to CREATE (or INTELLIGENTLY DESIGN; whatever tickles your fancy) everything we see around us, then what does it imply?

Sounds like creationism to me. The two are interchangeable; stop trying to reconcile creationism's mistakes in its attempt to transition into the realm of actual science.

ID is an intellectually bankrupt philosophy masquerading as scientific theory. It makes no predictions. It is not reproducible. It clings to a centuries-old ideology in spite of blatant evidence that says otherwise, and it doesn't build its inferences from the ground up; rather, it starts from presupposed ideas that can't even be defined properly.

What exactly is intelligence? What passes for design? Maybe once your camp can actually reach a consensus on something, the scientific community will stop treating you like a circus.

Edited by AdminModulous, : reply hidden. This thread is for subbie and Fallen only. Thank you.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022