Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,418 Year: 3,675/9,624 Month: 546/974 Week: 159/276 Day: 33/23 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is Evolution Reversible
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3259 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


Message 8 of 49 (509092)
05-18-2009 5:17 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by doc
05-18-2009 9:57 AM


It is theoretically possible, but highly unlikely that due to changing conditions, a species would revert to an ancestor species. More likely would be a new set of mutations that may end up with a similar looking species, or a species that has similar capabilities, but if you were to do an actual genetic sequence, it wouldn't match the progenitor that it now resembles again.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by doc, posted 05-18-2009 9:57 AM doc has not replied

  
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3259 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


Message 30 of 49 (509991)
05-26-2009 2:48 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by doc
05-25-2009 5:28 PM


Using the same solutions does not imply randomness.
Who said it's the same solution? Just because they look similar doesn't mean they are duplicates. Evolution, and natural selection in particular, are still constrained by the laws of physics. If selection is moving towards a flying model, the ultimate "design" is going to necessarily resemble the original flying model despite having, perhaps, an entirely different set of genes creating the apparatus.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by doc, posted 05-25-2009 5:28 PM doc has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by doc, posted 05-26-2009 3:01 PM Perdition has replied

  
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3259 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


Message 32 of 49 (509995)
05-26-2009 3:21 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by doc
05-26-2009 3:01 PM


Evolution does not have any "knowledge" and hence even if a "flying model" was better, evolution couldn't end up with an almost identical result through random mutation.
It depends on the environment and the population size. If you have a small number of individuals, then yes, the chance of it evolving is lower than if there are a large number of individuals. Assuming the environment is such that flying is better than not flying, from a reproductive success standpoint, and the basic bodyplan of the individual already comes with the necessary precursor apparatus, then any mutation would have to build on what is already there, and so will probably end up with something similar.
It is entirely possible, depending on the number of changes since the original flying type, for an exactly opposite mutation to occur, resulting in a wing that is genetically identical to the original, but it is more likely that a merely similar one would arise.
Edited by Perdition, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by doc, posted 05-26-2009 3:01 PM doc has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024