Transition from chemistry to biology

wounded king writes:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------I don't think you should, I think you are doing that
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
my reply: Frankly Im not performing any experiment.hahahahahaha.You missed.Wounded king writes:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the abiogenetic theory in question was based around life arising in 'sterelized water protected from contamination' then you would have made a cogent point, as none of them are you are making an unsupportable conflation between the form of spontaneous generation Pasteur's experiments addressed and naturalistic theories of origins
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My reply; Then according,to abiogenesis where did life come from?. There are many new forms spontaneous genaration in the past and many new forms in the future are yet coming,in other words abiogenesis is just a mask of spontaneous genaration.In fact texbooks discussed that organism react spontaneously,theres no utterance of abiogenesis reaction there.Wounded king writes:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------The only basis for this conflation is the semantic overlap where the word abiogenesis has been used both to describe spontaneous generation and modern naturalistic theories of the origin of life. Without making an actual argument showing that these two precepts are identical in more than sharing a name or by showing how Pasteur's experiments have anything to do with modern scientific studies of abiogenesis (in terms of naturalistic theories of life's origins) u are simply making a bald assertion with absolutely no supporting evidenceyo
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------My reply; There is no semantic overlaping in my post,the real issue here Wounded king is you and your co supporters of evolution are making bold efforts to separate abiogenesis from spontaneous genaration,due to the reason well known to them and to you.In general what does abiogenesis holds? And in general what does spontaneous genaration holds? Are they not holding that life is came from non life? Therefore,what is the difference.?The technical terms being used,I think. You write (u are simply making a bald assertion with absolutely no supporting evidenceyo) in fairness has science produced intermidiate forms of organism through Darwinian process? As in my part I often present scientific experiment that has been proven but you and your co supporters keep on rejecting due the reason well known to you.