Firstly thank you for replying and i very much appreciate your welcome. Also for informing me of my arguing with a literal wall. I want to make it completely clear that in no way do i think god hates or loves in the sense humnanity brings to mind. WE, humans, have emotion I beleive God in my own understanding(using term extremely lightly if not infact incorrectly but only if i'm incorrect which i can't prove or disprove)I was merely using a biblical stylization so as to reach those rooted entirely in religion iin order to illuminate the merits of science. So why sould i say what I did.
I beleive as i mentioned before that God was and in some sense still is an infinite primordial energy source that was "sarificed" (converted) into what is existance as we know it and that in said energy, which permeates existance because it is its "creator", there lies a funciton (The all encompassing function of reality,purely my own thoughts on the matter but increasingly more plausible with humanities greater understanding of the universe)within which all things must fall.
I was simply proposing that reality was becoming imbalanced in relation to the functions limits and it self corrected (Gods intervention) and by kicking away his footstool the earth was say hit by a massive asteroid during the KT Boundary. And in that light i was simply trying to draw the two seperate conclusions of existance together.
As for Lucifer i simply beleive that is a natural inbound force that works to be the negative side of the necessary negative-positive balance, but in this case the polarity was simply shifted too greatly thus the need for correction. Of course thius argument is more existential than physical due to my lack of subsantil evidence but i beleive that as mans understanding increases we might beable to draw the two together. As for my spelling and punctuation I apologise i ofter make mistakes due to my large and rather clumsy fingers if only my body worked as well as my mind. but alas a balance is formed. HAHA.
As for my "attack" on scientists I do admit it was a very subversive way to gain the trust of religious individuals but you must(not really but it would help) admit many scienist just as many religious officials especially feel there can be no common ground between science and religion but when i see or hear these kinds of people it both saddens me and makes me think back to what a man who was far more intelligent and had a far greater understandig of the basic principles of the universe than any of us once said something about science being blind maybe you know who i reference here[hint crazy awesome hair, five pairs of all the same clothes, and loved struedel(purely speculation but struedel is delicious)]
The last point i wish to make very clear. I AM BETTER THAN NO ONE!!! I was simply statin that i live where we all live i simply try(and fail miserable at times) to be as openminded and objective about my thoughts as possible but unfortunately i'm as human s the rest of you and too get riled up and make a fool of myself. You are completely right i hadn't quite realized the tone that last bit especially took. It sounds extremely self-righteous and i sincerely apologize. Thank you for keeping me grounded in that respect.
Sometimes i get carrid away by my thoughts and with passion comes the lose of objectivity. My main goal however, was to convey this one single idea, in the hope, that maybe those of you who are far better than me in both the scientific and religious worlds will cast aside ALL pride and do what scientist are supposed to try and see things as objectively as possible. Then, MAYBE progression will occour if not through any scientific findings maybe at the very least and understanding and acceptance that seems to hard for so many to grasp.
Again thank you for replying I enjoyed your input very much. (Sorry if there are any errors of syntax in my typing but i tried extra hard to do better this time)
Edited by AdminModulous, : broke a wall of text with some whitespace
™ Version 4.2