pandion writes:
Sure. No problem.
Well done, Evo.
The reason I linked to the Parsons paper is that it's probably the origin of the myth that Hunter replied to. It happened to come up with that magic number "6,500". This caused a lot of creationists to have orgasms.
But even at that time there were other papers on the control region with much lower figures, as you can see here:
Paper
That paper combines its data with Parsons and others, and the result, if I remember rightly, would have given a minimum of ~20,000 years for "Eve".
But you can still see the Parsons paper referred to (alone) on creationist web sites.