Understanding through Discussion

QuickSearch

 Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ] EvC Forum active members: 79 (8972 total)
 156 online now: DrJones*, jar, kjsimons, Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), xongsmith (5 members, 151 visitors) Newest Member: Howyoudo Post Volume: Total: 875,535 Year: 7,283/23,288 Month: 1,189/1,214 Week: 201/303 Day: 41/36 Hour: 0/1

EvC Forum Science Forums Geology and the Great Flood

# Was there a worldwide flood?

Author Topic:   Was there a worldwide flood?
Lysimachus
Member (Idle past 3701 days)
Posts: 380
Joined: 05-30-2004

 Message 272 of 372 (510902) 06-04-2009 2:50 PM

Did you all know that over 70% of the earth is flooded right now? Yeah, just look from a shuttle, and you will see. To conclude that the remaining 30% land was not also covered by water is a 3/10ths chance. So that leaves 7/10ths probability that the earth was once completely covered. :D Hah! Bet you never thought of that one! ;)

Edited by Lysimachus, : No reason given.

 Replies to this message: Message 273 by Son, posted 06-04-2009 3:08 PM Lysimachus has responded

Lysimachus
Member (Idle past 3701 days)
Posts: 380
Joined: 05-30-2004

 Message 274 of 372 (510912) 06-04-2009 4:28 PM Reply to: Message 273 by Son06-04-2009 3:08 PM

quote:

While what you said was complete nonsense, I think I can show you why (assuming you weren't being sarcastic). For a complete flood, you would need the highest mountain to be covered by water. If this mountain's height was 3000M, with your reasoning, it would have 70% chance of being flooded. But the chances would be the same if the mountain was 10000M high. You get such an absurd result because you can't use probability this way.
It would be like saying that a room that has a pool covering 50% of its surface has 50% chance of being flooded (by what?).

That could pose a problem, I suppose. I've read arguments from creationists against this. Some have proposed that there was supernatural involved.

But let's assume you are correct. Would it be logical to conclude that these mountains were that high prior to the flood? Or that perhaps these mountains were created either after the flood, or as a result of the seismic upheavel caused by the flood?

In addition to this, let us not fail to recognize the fact that sea fossils have been found on the peaks of very high mountains. It is my theory that these mountains were pushed up after the flood, since the earth was still suffering seismic after-shocks.

Edited by Lysimachus, : No reason given.

Edited by Lysimachus, : No reason given.

 This message is a reply to: Message 273 by Son, posted 06-04-2009 3:08 PM Son has responded

 Replies to this message: Message 275 by Theodoric, posted 06-04-2009 4:30 PM Lysimachus has responded Message 280 by Son, posted 06-05-2009 12:17 AM Lysimachus has not yet responded

Lysimachus
Member (Idle past 3701 days)
Posts: 380
Joined: 05-30-2004

 Message 276 of 372 (510914) 06-04-2009 4:44 PM Reply to: Message 275 by Theodoric06-04-2009 4:30 PM

quote:
Before addressing this, the issue of whether there was a flood needs to be addressed. Can you provide any evidence of such a phenomenon?

Not necessarily. The only question posed is, "were these mountains always there?" So regardless of whether a flood was in the picture or not matters little. Remember, the argument is that too much water would have been needed to cover these mountain peaks. I simply do not subscribe to the idea that the mountains were that high prior to the flood. And for good measure, mountains and islands are even being born today.

Could our oceans of today (that cover the earth) simply be the "left-overs" of the flood? Did the rest of the water partly vaporize and also settle into the earth as we know it?

 This message is a reply to: Message 275 by Theodoric, posted 06-04-2009 4:30 PM Theodoric has responded

 Replies to this message: Message 277 by Theodoric, posted 06-04-2009 5:11 PM Lysimachus has not yet responded Message 278 by Coyote, posted 06-04-2009 5:15 PM Lysimachus has not yet responded Message 279 by RAZD, posted 06-04-2009 7:18 PM Lysimachus has not yet responded

 Date format: mm-dd-yyyy Timezone: ET (US)
 Newer Topic | Older Topic Jump to:Board Administration     The Public Record     Announcements     Proposed New Topics     Suggestions and Questions Science Forums     The Bible: Accuracy and Inerrancy     Big Bang and Cosmology     Dates and Dating     Education and Creation/Evolution     Biological Evolution     Geology and the Great Flood     Human Origins and Evolution     Intelligent Design     Is It Science?     Creation/Evolution Miscellany     Origin of Life Social and Religious Issues     Bible Study     Comparative Religions     Social Issues and Creation/Evolution     Faith and Belief     Theological Creationism and ID Side Orders     Coffee House     The Great Debate     Free For All     Post of the Month     Links and Information     Creation/Evolution In The News     The Book Nook     Columnist     Practice Makes Perfect Archives     Topic Proposals Archive     Showcase Retired Forums     Short Subjects (No new topics or messages)     Welcome visitors