Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,585 Year: 2,842/9,624 Month: 687/1,588 Week: 93/229 Day: 4/61 Hour: 4/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   101 evidences for a young age...
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2285 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 5 of 135 (510897)
06-04-2009 1:48 PM


#4
quote:
The data for mitochondrial Eve are consistent with a common origin of all humans several thousand years ago.
In fact, mitochandrial eve lived 170.000 years ago. A bit longer then I think they want to say the earth is old.
#9
quote:
Living fossilsjellyfish, graptolites, coelacanth, stromatolites, Wollemi pine and hundreds more. That many hundreds of species could remain so unchanged, for even up to billions of years in the case of stromatolites, speaks against the millions and billions of years being real.
How so? Just because an organism is so well adopted to its environment that it doesn't change in appearance, doesn't mean the earth is young. Furthermore, today's species are VERY different from those found in the fossil record.
That's it for now.

I hunt for the truth

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by bluegenes, posted 06-04-2009 2:25 PM Huntard has replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2285 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 14 of 135 (510916)
06-04-2009 5:09 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by bluegenes
06-04-2009 2:25 PM



This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by bluegenes, posted 06-04-2009 2:25 PM bluegenes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by bluegenes, posted 06-04-2009 5:22 PM Huntard has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2285 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 117 of 135 (518957)
08-10-2009 3:43 AM
Reply to: Message 116 by slevesque
08-10-2009 2:55 AM


Re: reality testing
slevesque writes:
Well if tomorrow morning I would go in my backyard, and dig in the ground and find a authentic fossil of an centaur, get it dated at 20 millions years old, and then someone dwon the street does the same thing and at about the same depth findsa another centaur fossil which dates at 20 millions years old, then your image would be proof that centaurs and humans coexisted.
Humans didn't exist yet 20 million years ago. So no, it wouldn't be evidence humans and centaurs co-existed.
Of course, this is to show that your argument is fallacious: the two examples, centaurs and dinosaurs, are not analog because fossils of the latter have been found.
Neither have there been fossils found of the depictions of "dinosaurs/dragons" you claim co-existed with humans.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by slevesque, posted 08-10-2009 2:55 AM slevesque has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024