Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,437 Year: 3,694/9,624 Month: 565/974 Week: 178/276 Day: 18/34 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Are Creationists shooting themselves in the foot?
slevesque
Member (Idle past 4662 days)
Posts: 1456
Joined: 05-14-2009


Message 22 of 80 (511096)
06-06-2009 5:01 AM


Creationism as an identifiable movement is around since the 70's I think.
But using the biblical account of creation as historical is as old as christianity itself, so I doubt it is really shooting christianity in the foot.
I would rather think the opposite, that YEC helps sustain christianity. As a 'proof' of this, I can say that there is no creationist movement over here in Quebec (canada) and christianity is on a much more steep decline then in the US.

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Meldinoor, posted 06-07-2009 12:16 AM slevesque has replied
 Message 25 by Nuggin, posted 06-08-2009 12:10 AM slevesque has not replied

  
slevesque
Member (Idle past 4662 days)
Posts: 1456
Joined: 05-14-2009


Message 24 of 80 (511154)
06-07-2009 12:48 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by Meldinoor
06-07-2009 12:16 AM


Re: Got the cart before the horse?
Quebec is very different from Canada. In western Canada (BC, Alberta, etc.) there is a good creationist movement with religious percentages very similar to the US. Lots of evangelical christians over there.
Here in Quebec, its is not evangelical, it is catholic. In fact up to the 1950's, 99% of the population were practising catholics. In a time-span of 50 years, that pourcentage went down to maybe 5%. (and I'm being generous here). I think the fact that catholics compromised on the issue of origins with evolution had a negative impact on the number of christians here, not a positive one.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Meldinoor, posted 06-07-2009 12:16 AM Meldinoor has not replied

  
slevesque
Member (Idle past 4662 days)
Posts: 1456
Joined: 05-14-2009


Message 39 of 80 (511346)
06-09-2009 1:00 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Percy
06-09-2009 11:02 AM


Historically, there has been one way of interpreting the creation account.
The new ways of interpreting genesis came in the early 1900's when churches started compromising with the scientific facts.
The question is now, why would have God hidden the truth of Genesis for over 1800 years to his church ?
I personnally think that every theologian up to the 1900's had the correcte interpretation of genesis. If science proves this to be wrong, then the Bible is not the word of God, it is the word of faillible men.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Percy, posted 06-09-2009 11:02 AM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by Coragyps, posted 06-09-2009 1:49 PM slevesque has not replied
 Message 46 by Taq, posted 06-09-2009 3:23 PM slevesque has not replied
 Message 49 by dwise1, posted 06-09-2009 3:46 PM slevesque has not replied
 Message 50 by Phage0070, posted 06-09-2009 3:54 PM slevesque has not replied
 Message 54 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-09-2009 6:28 PM slevesque has not replied

  
slevesque
Member (Idle past 4662 days)
Posts: 1456
Joined: 05-14-2009


Message 41 of 80 (511350)
06-09-2009 1:04 PM


What a coicidence that AiG did a research study through America's research Group) exactly on this very subject and that the results have been published this month lol. They say the results are shocking.
The book is Already Gone, it costs 13bucks (hey, they have to finance these research somehow, since they don't have government funds hh)
Edited by slevesque, : grammar

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-09-2009 2:14 PM slevesque has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024