Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,397 Year: 3,654/9,624 Month: 525/974 Week: 138/276 Day: 12/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   coded information in DNA
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 211 of 334 (511433)
06-09-2009 6:08 PM


Let's Make It Easier ...
WordBeLogos has failed, so far, to point out any example of a code, the origin of which we know by observation, that has a supernatural origin.
Let me make it even easier for him.
WBL, can you point out any thing ... anything at all, the origin of which we know by observation, that has a supernatural origin?
Anything whatsoever?
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 220 by WordBeLogos, posted 06-09-2009 8:58 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Percy
Member
Posts: 22480
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 212 of 334 (511435)
06-09-2009 6:12 PM
Reply to: Message 209 by WordBeLogos
06-09-2009 6:02 PM


Re: Sequence Specificity
WordBeLogos writes:
Real quick before I go, I think your forgetting that I'm not arguing codes can't change, *ONCE* they exist in the first place.
I don't think you know what you're arguing. The message you just replied to wasn't about codes, it was about specified complexity and how you apparently don't even recognize your own position when someone repeats it back to you.
Word, the ends do not justify the means. No God worth his salt would want you to lie in defending him, and the all-powerful Christian God needs no defenders anyway. What you're actually doing is defending your sense that you're right. Just do a couple simple things and you'll feel much better about yourself. Only write about things you understand using words that are your own, and don't ignore responses, especially to the extent of reiterating (over and over) your prior points as if they've never been rebutted.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 209 by WordBeLogos, posted 06-09-2009 6:02 PM WordBeLogos has not replied

WordBeLogos
Member (Idle past 5413 days)
Posts: 103
From: Ohio
Joined: 05-25-2009


Message 213 of 334 (511453)
06-09-2009 7:57 PM
Reply to: Message 210 by Parasomnium
06-09-2009 6:06 PM


Re: Faulty premises
Hi Parasomnium,
First of all, DNA may look like a code but that might be an illusion.
If we are simply going to reduce this down to "mights," then it might actually be what it looks like.
I find it interesting that many here will say DNA is not a information comunication system, while at the same time insist that gravity, pebbles and snowflakes are. I suggest you read here if you actually believe DNA is not a code. Is DNA a Code?
Just like it is unnecessary to assume a flow of information in the reaction of hydrogen and oxygen to form water, there is no need for such an assumption in the more complex chemistry of DNA and proteins.
Please read here... Alleged Examples of Naturally Occurring Code
You have come into this discussion far to late if you still see no difference between a water molecule and the system contained in a DNA molecule, sorry.
Second, it's a bit parochial to think that since we humans have never observed a code other than those originating from conscious minds, such codes from non-conscious origin cannot exist at all. We have hardly looked everywhere, have we?
You are free to wait, I've never said it's impossible. There is just no evidence to the contrary. In the same manner, we are free to wait and see if it's true that neither matter nor energy can be destroyed. These are inferences based on the scientific method of induction. No evidence to the contrary has *EVER* been provided. Should we throw both claims out then?
Let's say I tell you that in all cases of my observation of mammals, 100% of them, they can always fly. (Say I live on a small island in the Pacific where the only mammals are bats.) Does that mean that flightless mammals cannot exist?
It most certainly does not. But you are indeed making a rational inference, *UNTIL* the one who claims otherwise shows evidence to the contrary. Can you show me evidence to the contrary that coded information systems only come from a mind? All you need is one.
To me, your logic is akin to this:
Premise 1: An alligator is a mammal;
Premise 2: All mammals can fly;
Conclusion: Alligators can fly.
But it can be demonstrated not all mammals can fly. Can you demonstrate not all coded information systems come from minds?
-Word

John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 210 by Parasomnium, posted 06-09-2009 6:06 PM Parasomnium has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 215 by Blue Jay, posted 06-09-2009 8:10 PM WordBeLogos has replied
 Message 216 by onifre, posted 06-09-2009 8:14 PM WordBeLogos has replied
 Message 219 by Percy, posted 06-09-2009 8:47 PM WordBeLogos has replied
 Message 230 by Parasomnium, posted 06-10-2009 4:56 PM WordBeLogos has replied

lyx2no
Member (Idle past 4737 days)
Posts: 1277
From: A vast, undifferentiated plane.
Joined: 02-28-2008


Message 214 of 334 (511454)
06-09-2009 8:01 PM
Reply to: Message 194 by WordBeLogos
06-09-2009 2:47 PM


Yes, We Can.
The question that we can’t answer, is where the code came from in the first place.
It is merely a chemical reaction that protolife took advantage of. It's been answered.
AbE:
which uses a system of symbols
I wear a red carnation as a signal to my accomplice that we're being observed; white indicates that we can speak freely. They are symbols. Neither the red nor the white carnation actually cause the event signaled. Codons causes the binding of an amino acid. It doesn't require an intelligent interpreter.
Edited by lyx2no, : Later post.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them.
Thomas Jefferson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 194 by WordBeLogos, posted 06-09-2009 2:47 PM WordBeLogos has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 246 by WordBeLogos, posted 06-13-2009 10:34 PM lyx2no has not replied

Blue Jay
Member (Idle past 2718 days)
Posts: 2843
From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts
Joined: 02-04-2008


Message 215 of 334 (511456)
06-09-2009 8:10 PM
Reply to: Message 213 by WordBeLogos
06-09-2009 7:57 PM


Re: Faulty premises
Hi, WordBeLogs.
WordBeLogos writes:
But it can be demonstrated not all mammals can fly.
By the guy on the island who has only ever seen bats?
I trow not.

-Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus)
Darwin loves you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 213 by WordBeLogos, posted 06-09-2009 7:57 PM WordBeLogos has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 247 by WordBeLogos, posted 06-13-2009 10:39 PM Blue Jay has not replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2971 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 216 of 334 (511457)
06-09-2009 8:14 PM
Reply to: Message 213 by WordBeLogos
06-09-2009 7:57 PM


Re: Faulty premises
Can you demonstrate not all coded information systems come from minds?
Yes, DNA is a natural process.
You have not proven otherwise so this is still a fact.
First prove that something other than natural exists, beyond your incredulous opinion, then you can argue that DNA is not natural because now there is another option, not just an imagined cause.
You can't introduce your imaginary friend to answer scientific questions.
- Oni

Petition to Bailout Comedy The Laugh Factory is imploring Congress to immediately fund what owner Jamie Masada calls an "Economic Cheer-Up." If Congress fails to act quickly, the Laugh Factory comedians are planning to march to Washington and plea to President Obama.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 213 by WordBeLogos, posted 06-09-2009 7:57 PM WordBeLogos has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 249 by WordBeLogos, posted 06-13-2009 10:53 PM onifre has not replied

WordBeLogos
Member (Idle past 5413 days)
Posts: 103
From: Ohio
Joined: 05-25-2009


Message 217 of 334 (511458)
06-09-2009 8:17 PM
Reply to: Message 188 by Huntard
06-09-2009 10:08 AM


Re: UNcaused?
Hello Huntard,
Huntard writes:
Word writes:
Reason alone using the scientific method of induction, points to an original uncaused Encoder as the only available exlplanation, at this time.
How so UNcaused? Why can't it be an intelligence that istself was casued, which then caused the code in DNA? How are you so certain that whatever caused the code in DNA has to come from an UNcaused intelligence?
Because it leads to an infinite regress of causes that had causes themselves. This is irrational. The only rational conclusion is there must ultimately be an Uncaused (eternal) cause that has caused all caused (finite) things to exist. Ironically, this also describes the biblical God.
-Word

John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by Huntard, posted 06-09-2009 10:08 AM Huntard has not replied

WordBeLogos
Member (Idle past 5413 days)
Posts: 103
From: Ohio
Joined: 05-25-2009


Message 218 of 334 (511461)
06-09-2009 8:46 PM
Reply to: Message 189 by Dr Adequate
06-09-2009 1:02 PM


Dr,
All of human observation tells us that information systems, languages and codes, always come from sources that do not break the laws of nature.
*Operating* through, and *originating* from, are two different things.
As of now, observing that all supernaturalistic explanations have failed to explain the origin of biological information,..
A supernatural explanation is inferred.
...natural processes stand alone as the *ONLY* known processes to produce such information intense systems.
Natural processes do not stand alone as the *ONLY* known process, they have never been observed to produce information intense systems.
It's simple Dr. Intelligence has been observed to do it. Not processes *KNOWN* to be absent of intelligence. But we did't make ourselves or life. So the inference is, an intelligence other than ourselves. And to go further, an intelligence that is uncaused, because finite causes need causes themselves. Which then leads to an Uncaused (eternal) cause. As a Christian myself, I believe this is the biblical God.
-Word

John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 189 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-09-2009 1:02 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 226 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-10-2009 11:33 AM WordBeLogos has replied

Percy
Member
Posts: 22480
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 219 of 334 (511462)
06-09-2009 8:47 PM
Reply to: Message 213 by WordBeLogos
06-09-2009 7:57 PM


Re: Faulty premises
WordBeLogos writes:
I find it interesting that many here will say DNA is not a information comunication system...
I guess it figures that if you can't even keep your own position straight that you can't keep ours straight either. Despite your statement that many here claim DNA does not contain information, Parasomnium is one of the few in this thread to suggest this. Most of us would disagree with him. Everything in the universe contains information, and new information is being created naturally all the time.
Second, it's a bit parochial to think that since we humans have never observed a code other than those originating from conscious minds, such codes from non-conscious origin cannot exist at all. We have hardly looked everywhere, have we?
You are free to wait, I've never said it's impossible. There is just no evidence to the contrary.
You've been provided so many examples of natural codes I've lost count. We're all waiting for you to provide an answer that goes beyond, "That's not a code."
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 213 by WordBeLogos, posted 06-09-2009 7:57 PM WordBeLogos has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 250 by WordBeLogos, posted 06-13-2009 11:02 PM Percy has replied

WordBeLogos
Member (Idle past 5413 days)
Posts: 103
From: Ohio
Joined: 05-25-2009


Message 220 of 334 (511463)
06-09-2009 8:58 PM
Reply to: Message 211 by Dr Adequate
06-09-2009 6:08 PM


Re: Let's Make It Easier ...
Dr,
Let me make it even easier for him.
WBL, can you point out any thing ... anything at all, the origin of which we know by observation, that has a supernatural origin?
Anything whatsoever?
The universe. The laws of nature did not exist prior to their creation in this universe. The creation of the universe was a supernatural event. The existence of the supernatural is a fact.
-Word
P.S. gnite fellas, peace.

John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 211 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-09-2009 6:08 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 223 by Phage0070, posted 06-10-2009 8:26 AM WordBeLogos has replied
 Message 224 by onifre, posted 06-10-2009 8:30 AM WordBeLogos has replied
 Message 227 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-10-2009 11:34 AM WordBeLogos has not replied

Phage0070
Inactive Member


Message 221 of 334 (511531)
06-10-2009 8:07 AM
Reply to: Message 198 by WordBeLogos
06-09-2009 4:10 PM


WordBeLogos writes:
The question of where the molecule came from and how it operates is an important one but not relevant to the discussion at hand. The question that needs answered, is where the code / message came from in the first place. The immaterial information the physical medium carries.
Of course it is relevant to the discussion at hand! You have not specified what exactly "immaterial information" the DNA contains. All the research I have seen indicates that DNA's function is entirely dependent on its structure, e.g. the very antithesis of "immaterial information". If you claim that there is information contained in DNA which is independent of the medium, YOU MUST SPECIFY!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 198 by WordBeLogos, posted 06-09-2009 4:10 PM WordBeLogos has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 251 by WordBeLogos, posted 06-13-2009 11:07 PM Phage0070 has replied

Richard Townsend
Member (Idle past 4753 days)
Posts: 103
From: London, England
Joined: 07-16-2008


Message 222 of 334 (511532)
06-10-2009 8:12 AM


Stated simply, Word, it's not possible to deduce that all codes are the product of intelligence just because some are. Even if we grant you (which personally I don't) that ALL the codes we know the origin of are the products of intelligence, the same is true.
The conclusion does not follow. I know you think PMarshall has accounted for this, but there is no way out of this.

Replies to this message:
 Message 252 by WordBeLogos, posted 06-13-2009 11:11 PM Richard Townsend has replied

Phage0070
Inactive Member


Message 223 of 334 (511534)
06-10-2009 8:26 AM
Reply to: Message 220 by WordBeLogos
06-09-2009 8:58 PM


Re: Let's Make It Easier ...
Usually this argument is not made, namely because it is a terrible argument. Before those more experienced in rebutting get a hold of it, allow me to point out some of the more glaringly obvious flaws in this thinking:
1) You assume "creation" both occurred and is an artificial event, without considering any possible alternatives. For instance it may be possible that the universe simply cycles between very different sets of physical laws, or even what we perceive as the "beginning" of physical laws is actually a process well within them. In any case there is no cause to make unsupported statements like this.
2) By assuming that the entire universe was created supernaturally you are destroying any possible credibility you may have been assumed to have to be able to recognize the difference between natural and supernatural phenomenon. If the universe is wholly supernatural in origin then you cannot possibly have any experience with natural things, so your ability to distinguish between them is very shaky.
3) Your statement is just that, a statement. You don't show any supporting evidence whatsoever, or even any *logic*. This is an extremely poor method of debate and signals poor thinking skills.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 220 by WordBeLogos, posted 06-09-2009 8:58 PM WordBeLogos has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 253 by WordBeLogos, posted 06-13-2009 11:27 PM Phage0070 has replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2971 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 224 of 334 (511535)
06-10-2009 8:30 AM
Reply to: Message 220 by WordBeLogos
06-09-2009 8:58 PM


Re: Let's Make It Easier ...
Dr. a writes:
Let me make it even easier for him.
WBL, can you point out any thing ... anything at all, the origin of which we know by observation, that has a supernatural origin?
Anything whatsoever?
Word writes:
The universe.
And you, we, know this by observation...?
The creation of the universe was a supernatural event.
PROBLEM, the universe wasn't "created". The 4 dimentional universe we are in was not created out of nothing, it expanded from a quantum state, therefore there was something prior to the Big Bang. It just wasn't a dimentional space.
The existence of the supernatural is a fact.
Oh, swing and a miss. Thought you had it, didn't you?
Try again.
- Oni

Petition to Bailout Comedy The Laugh Factory is imploring Congress to immediately fund what owner Jamie Masada calls an "Economic Cheer-Up." If Congress fails to act quickly, the Laugh Factory comedians are planning to march to Washington and plea to President Obama.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 220 by WordBeLogos, posted 06-09-2009 8:58 PM WordBeLogos has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 254 by WordBeLogos, posted 06-13-2009 11:38 PM onifre has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13014
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 225 of 334 (511536)
06-10-2009 8:39 AM


Topic Reminder
This topic is about coded information in DNA. Please take discussion about evidence for the supernatural to another thread, or propose a new thread over at [forum=-25].

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

Replies to this message:
 Message 228 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-10-2009 11:53 AM Admin has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024