This is off-topic, but just to clarify what Dr. Jones is saying, the coelacanth is considered a legitimate living fossil, but it is also true that it is not unchanged from 60 or 70 million years ago (the age of the most recent known fossils). The coelacanth species alive today are not the same ones as those fossil species. Coelacanth doesn't even refer to a species, it's an order. That's three levels up from the species level (species, genus, family, order). Other living fossil species like the horseshoe crab are in the same situation, very similar to remote ancestors but not the same species.
I agree with others that your first attempt at an analogy to evolution, the video copying, should be abandoned.
The purpose of an analogy is explanatory, to render understandable something unfamiliar by showing how it is similar to something familiar. But there is nothing similar to evolution in day-to-day experience - if there were then evolution would have been figured out long before Darwin, and there wouldn't be so much difficulty understanding it today.
You mentioned the creationist "tornado in a junkyard" analogy, and it isn't an analogy to evolution in any recognizable way. Random parts just flying together to create a 747 is a miracle, not evolution.
I'd never heard of the creationist house blueprint analogy, but it sounds like something that might have potential. How's it go?
--Percy
Edited by Percy, : Grammar.