Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,890 Year: 4,147/9,624 Month: 1,018/974 Week: 345/286 Day: 1/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Methodological Naturalism is fallacious
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2323 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 4 of 50 (514398)
07-07-2009 9:24 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by mike the wiz
07-07-2009 6:40 AM


Mike, the biggest problem with this is that reason can be found why anything that happens doesn't neccesarily have to have a natural explanation.
Examples:
Gravity? The flying spaghetti monster is pushing all mass towards other mass.
Nucleosynthesis? The immaterial pink unicorn rearranges the parts of the atoms, so that they become different atoms.
Are you beginnig to see the problem with this? How can we determine if a deity has been at work, when we have absolutely NO way to measure or observe this deity's actions?

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by mike the wiz, posted 07-07-2009 6:40 AM mike the wiz has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024