Evolutionary Theory Explains Diversity

Because in my theory, I have facts and experiments.
If I don't have, I will never say so. Anybody could say that...and I don't care about it.
I could say that too to TOE. But it is a waste of time. You don't really understand your position. You are very confused person.
I don't question biology. I question TOE in biology for I believe that in biology
life must be the first priority, that is why, the FIRST and MAIN mechanism in the
preservation of life for Interrelation Theory is biotic preservation mechanism.
TOE lacks this importance of life. I forgive you for this. Yes, fact will never change in nature. It is only the point of observation of reference
that will change. If you will use the incomplete TOE in biology, then, fine.
I don't care. Yes it is true if and only if TOE will use a very limited or incomplete mechanisms.
You don't really understand. Since TOE had deliberately neglected or
undiscovered or ignored time mechanism (and other mechanisms) in nature, you will simply
arrive in the same conclusion with TOE. Incorrect conclusion by using
incomplete mechanisms, that result in incorrect theory.Explanation in nature must be "cube", but since TOE had been neglecting and
deliberateley ignoring time mechanisms and etc as describe in Interrelation Theory that are
observable in nature, then, the picture that TOE is presenting is "square".Now square is totally different from cube! Did you get me? You don't understand real life. Maybe you need to study more about people in science.
You can say anything you want to say. That is your opinion but as long as you can't
refute my claim in biology of my theory, I will still hold that title.So if you come here to make satirical or emotional comment, leave them at home.
Let us talk science here. Many people are dying everyday and they need to know
that their life are important. And we need to know exactly the origin of organisms
and humans. We need to clear this. You don't know how science works?I have already put up my claims. Supposed to be I will be printing it in books,
but I decide to put it in website so that many people could see it.
They are openly written in the website.
And this web site is still changing since many logical ideas are coming everyday.
If you don't like it since it directly attack TOE, then, you can put your own web
site and refute it. If somebody could claim to refute that I will surely delete it.
But until now, none. Maybe you can. Maybe you need to read this first before you judge.What Do Rats Eat?My observation tells me that rats can almost eat anything. Well, it depends on the people
about their rats.
I did not say a pet rat for testing. Look at my original post.
I said a "house rat" that means a "pest" to a certain house.Well, if the scientist had his own rat, then, fine. He can use it.
The goal is not the rat but the theory that claim that it debunked TOE.Read first before you post, it is already written there. Your country is just following the laws that I've stated in the biotic preservation
mechanism of my theory. My country too is following it.
You can read the detail in my BPM mechanism if you would
like to see my view.You should not be surprised since you are accepting the
validity of TOE, then, you must be the one, by definition, who are doing animal-abuse,
human rights violations, immoral acts, inhuman treatment and the likes.
Since by definiton, TOE had no purpose whatsoever in life. Since the existence
of every living organisms in TOE is being done
by unconscious natural selection mechanisn, then, life must have no meaning at all in TOE.Do you want more about this? The implications of real TOE in nature and society?
You will never like it. I wish you shold not open it, for your sakes.Yes, I did try it. I don't hit them with sticks. Those frogs, fishes, dogs,
cats, chickens, crabs and other were used as foods. Some parts in my country (before)
ate dogs and mountain cats. I tried once eating both.They are not animal abuses since we consumed them for foods.
Maybe you need to read my background first. But all of these animals they had life too,
and the moment you took their life or before you took their life
for your foods, you will know the same result. And the most aching part of it is when you
saw some of animals cried (have literally tears in their eyes) for asking life.
That is the reason why I don't believe in natural selection is happening in nature.
I cannot blame you, you are the one who are opposing animal abuses, me too, then,
you knew for sure that life, even in animal, is very important.
So, you are just putting weight on my theory. Thank you.I forgave you for this. Yes, TOE will surely say evolution since TOE had forgotten the time mechanism.
Yes, the encoded genomes works in the biotic preservation mechanism.
Thank you for putting the details. I don't have time putting up details since
I will leave that to our other scientists who will work for that. But my job is to find
the right mechanism now and the right theory.It is true that an organism which does not seek to preserve its own life would not
survive long enough to pass on its defective genes but it doesn not mean also
that this organism had already lost its desire to live longer or had lost its desire to
have a corrected genes. My experiment tells me the facts about it.This is the big difference between the natural selection and
the biotic preservation mechanism.You see, natural selection is false, inhuman, cruel, unnatural, unscientific
..It doesn't make any sense. Wishful thinking??? You made me laugh.There are many explanations. I knew it. Some may neglect others some may include others.
Some are none.But in my Interrelation Theory, I included almost everything that TOE had forgotten.
So if TOE is square, Interrelaton Theory is cube. I can say that too to TOE. But I am not that person, I still honor those scientists in
their fields since they are also humans like me who had life to live.
Nothing personal in scientific fields. We are just trying to argue which is which.
If I found wrong, then, so be it. If I found them wrong, then, so be it.
Nothing personal. We are all the same humans.Don't worry. I knew that you will surely hate me since
I've been saying and claiming that TOE is wrong. It's life.But it did not say that all the TOE are stupid. Scientists in TOE are intelligent
(but of course not perfect, so errors will found)
that but they've forgotten some mechanisms that are undiscovered.
I've just said that there are undiscovered and unknown mechanisms in nature that TOE had
forgotten that is why TOE is now incorrect and wrong.

I understand what scientific theory is. I also understand that TOE is scientific theory but TOE is incomplete theory. Therefore, it is incomplete scientific theory...that means wrong.

Here is my working definition of theory. This is where I follow.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nL5GotAVN58

Every things you said had impact on me. But I am also thinking for a better explanation.But anyway, thank you.

Hi RAZD, sorry that I'm late in my reply. I was very busy on this days.In plants? Yes, some vegetables garden. I've just watched them the way I've watched
the mongo beans. They had the same results.Plants don't avoid stick since plants can't move. You knew it already,
it is very obvious. But there are some plants that I've experimented that
when you touched their leaves, they folded down.
I hope I can give the name to you, but
I will try to search it here in my place.
I knew the name in my local name but I forgot the name in English.
Next time , I can give it you.The result is the same...Interrelation.Not yet in bacteria, but the nylon-eating bacteria did interrelate as seen in lab.
With sponges? Not yet. Starfish? Not yet. Coral? Not yet.
Opossums? Not yet. Turtles? Yes. It tried to hide its head when threaten. You are correct that "the ability of
life to react to it's environment is one of the defining
elements of living things" and that is the reason why I had
usd the biotic preservation mechanism as the main
mechanism of Interelation Theory beacsue that it should be. I've proven that all living things made life as "first" priority. Of course, but there is a sequence..a pattern. That is
the reason why time mechanism is very important.
Even the living organisms too knew the difference
between the "needs" and the "wants" for them.They need life, they want food.Which is first? Life first, then food.
Look at the rats again. Let's use a mousetrap.
If the rats sense danger, eventhough the food is
too delicious for them, they fled leaving food.
(Wow, I did it many times in
our house since we had many pests (rats).This is a pattern...a time mechanism.
This is a simple of pattern in time mechanism. Eventhough you have population, eventhough you have generation, eventhough you have
million years, TOE will never make it. Why? Since TOE had forgotten time mechanism.
Time mechanism kills TOE. Ok, it is very easy. In TOE, the above explanation maybe correct.But in Interrelation Theory, the graph that had been presented is the graph
of Interrelation Theory. The graph was telling us that in the process of
their interrelation to the environmenet and surroundings with
respect to time, those lemurs were changing. But very limited. And gradually changing
since the earth geological phase was very slow.What Interrelation Theory said in the time mechanism is that the lemur will never
cross on its base species. Base species is the species that were designed by CIO
to live and interrelate with the respect to time (era) and surroundings.Those lemurs were still lemurs. Their change was very limited.
And they changed by the process of BPM.
So, we are still talking Interrelation Theory here. If you could see Interelation Theory web site, it talks about
Time Mechanism, the MSM there.To make it short, nature has her own pattern of any stages,
that if that pattern breaks, the whole system fails.For example, let us look at the human embryo...The fetus has a pattern, a change, a time sequence and stages.From the time of sexual intercourse (release of gamete),
this fetus with respect to time is following a pattern/stages but fetus
follows a certain fixed and pre-set pattern with time.
But if you could see, this fetus will never break its
pattern in all child-bearing mother's embryo.
If it breaks, the child will die.The pattern is the same to all human embryo, but the changes
will only/limited to the sizes, weight, exact duration of stages and maybe
position of fetuses with respect to all fetuses in all human embryos.The fetus has a fixed or limited stages with respect to time
and the change is permissible change of fetus to every embryo to survive.This is one explanation in time mechanism in Interrelation Theory.(I had here in my mind clearly but I could hardly put it
in words in English. Maybe I need to rephrase the above explanation
so that all could understand) (Or somebody here could rephrase it for us,
if you understand the concept of time mechanism, please).So in the above picture, the ignored part is time: that the change of lemur
(like the change of fetus) is inevitable, but this change had a limit.This is the ignored part. What causes of the limitations? The natural processes or patterns or stages
of cells in all living forms are the limitations. I say cells because I suspect that cells
was the one which is doing it. My observation tells me that nature, to preserve
life, has pre-set and has fixed process but it has also allowable and permissible
factor of change. The CIO is very intelligent since
while the process or pattern in nature is fixed and irreversible,
the process can accumulate limited (allowable) change as factor of safety of that
pattern or process,
and when this process breaks or when the changes exceeds, the system will fail.
Thus, no preservation of life.What the TOE had been seeing is the only the "allowable or limited change with respect to time"
of the pre-set pattern or stages. That means,
in reality, the actual definition of evolution would be"Evolution is the allowable or limited change in any process/stage in ansystem with
respect to time"
but since evolution is only a limited change in the system, evolution is not the
purpose of the system nor not the system at all.Therefore if TOE will forget the time mechanism, TOE will become the whole system,
an not the limited part in the system.Now, "whole" and "part" is different. Like square and cube is different.Did you get me? I knew it. I've been going back to my drawing board and found out always
that TOE is wrong since it ignored the time mechanism. Yeah, the above explanaton fits the TOE.But, Interrelation Theory has an explanation for that. In Interrelation Theory, the
APM mechanism is responsible for that. In short, the inserts were the results of the
fights between virus and the cells, and the inserts were actually the "scars" left in fight.I mean, all living organisms to survive had a defense mechanism as stated in my Advantageous
Properties Mechanism. And if we could find it in two different species, in the same place,
then, this virus, on the history of these two species, attacked the two species,
on the same time/era!That means, the two species had no common descent! The viral infections were telling it so!

Thanks for the question.Yes, TOE's natural selection is really unnatural.I don't know if you had read this:Biotic Preservation Mechanism (BPM) is a mechanism in where all individual organism
in a given population interrelates due to the fact that their "life" or "existence"
is very important to them. In short, there is the need for all individual organisms
to preserve and protect their life, as an individual and as an entity. There is also
that force, the biotic preservation force that triggers all individual organisms to
interrelate just to survive. This is the reason why in our observable nature,
all living things interrelates . This is a behavioral mechanism.

​

Influence in some ways? Yes, possible.

​

Basis in molecular biology? No, Behavioral biology, I think is OK. Not molecular.
The other mechanism of Interrelation Theory will.

​

Organelles in cells? maybe not, but in other mechanism, I think it is OK.

Yes, a theory can be considered wrong by contradictory evidence. And the cause of this contradictory evidence is that TOE is incomplete in the light of new evidence.TOE ignores time...just like flat-earthers ignore the pictures of earth from space, from moon!

It is correct that in living organisms they have heritable trait but
it doesn't mean that this trait will be the factor in the origin of new organisms
or species. It is wrong to conclude that.You can read my response to RAZD, for further explanation. Of course, you can call the result evolution by natural selection. But as Interrelation
Theory states that the reason why the plant and all plants are struggling to live
and struggling to change (interrelate) in nature is that because of
biotic preservation mechanism, BPM and not the natural selection.And the reason why we cannot rely now in TOE is just because TOE had an
incomplete mechanisms. Incomplete mechanisms will result in incomplete explanation,
that will result in incomplete and therefore, erroneous theory in science. [qs]Animals need to survive long enough to reach reproductive age before
they can leave any offspring. Once they have, the longer they survive
the more they can usually produce. For species
like rats that care for their young, their continued survival also increases
the survival chances of their offspring. From all this, evolutionary theory
would predict that animals, generally speaking, exhibit traits that cause
them to avoid mortal danger (except when necessary for a ‘higher causeElike mating).
Your experiment shows that a rat’s reaction to a physical threat from a big lumbering
thing with a stick is to frantically try and escape, preserving its life.
This is exactly what evolutionary theory predicts.{/qsWell, what should I say. In TOE perspective maybe you are correct.Of course, you can call the result evolution by natural selection. But as Interrelation
Theory states that the reason why the plant and all plants are struggling to live
and struggling to change (interrelate) in nature is that because of
biotic preservation mechanism, BPM and not the natural selection.And the reason why we cannot rely now in TOE is just because TOE had an
incomplete mechanisms. Incomplete mechanisms will result in incomplete explanation,
that will result in incomplete and therefore, erroneous theory in science. I think it is time mechanism that separates TOE from Interrelation Theory.
Of course, Interrelation Theory had still three mechanisms to offer.Of course, you can call the result evolution by natural selection. But as Interrelation
Theory states that the reason why the plant and all plants are struggling to live
and struggling to change (interrelate) in nature is that because of
biotic preservation mechanism, BPM and not the natural selection.And the reason why we cannot rely now in TOE is just because TOE had an
incomplete mechanisms. Incomplete mechanisms will result in incomplete explanation,
that will result in incomplete and therefore, erroneous theory in science.

Well, since it is life that the rat was protecting, then, it must be
biotic preservation mechanism. Nothing else, nothing more. What you are asking me are some details. I understand it. But the main job for me is to
make a right mechanisms and theory for the observed facts in nature.
The rests will be details. Of course there are connections since in Interelation Theory,
there are all in all four mechanisms that go hand in hand with each others.So, to clear those details out are very simple.First, let's build the house. After that, the furnishing and finishings. Yeah, there will be some similarity in TOE. But in Interrelation Theory, "life" is the
purpose of all living organisms that is why the main mechanism is biotic preservation
mechanisms BPM. But in TOE, it is the opposite. TOE believes that natural selection is the
main mechanism for rats to change, while in Interrelation Theory, it is the will to survive
or BPM cause those rats to change.It is the opposite, right? The starting point is totally opposite. Thanks. You made me laugh.Have you never notice that we don't now believe that the earth is flat and the sun revolves
around the earth? Why? Because we are looking for new mechanisms that fit the facts.The more we have mechanisms in the complex living organisms, the more
we can see the actual happening and the actual observable facts in nature.Planetary motions, angular momentum, orbital deflection,.etc...they are different from
living organisms. So we need to deal them separately. Three dimesions is better than
two dimensions. I knew that. But four mechanisms is not too much in the living organisms.
Why?Here's why:evolution is the change in time.Since TOE does not have time mechanism eventhough its definition requiree it
in its definition, TOE is incorrect. So time actually kills TOE. I can say that too to TOE. But I think you need to study more on time mechanism,
yeah, just for your own new learning. Once you've seen what I've seen, you will
surely know that I am correct.Well, eventhough you cannot accept this theory, I don't care.Even so, Interrelation Theory is still there, observable and yestable.Pleae, read my reply to RAZD. I think you will know this theory a little bit.

How come you pre-judge me without seeing the video???If that is the way you treat an event and problem in nature, judging without seeing the facts,
then
it is predictable that you cannot make a good conclusion of the facts of nature.I think the reason why you will defend to death the TOE, not beacsue TOE is correct,
but maybe because of your pre-assumptioned belief, right?Your definition of theory is still incorrect. You need to watch the video,
it will help you a lot.

Time. Time kills TOE.Can you please, read some of my answers to RAZD.
Read some of my answers/posts here.If not, you will never know Interrelation Theory.
Know your enemy first b4 u fight.http://www.interrelation-theory.comEdited by interrelation, : No reason given.Edited by interrelation, : No reason given.