Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Lineage of Jesus
John
Inactive Member


Message 37 of 82 (50706)
08-16-2003 10:31 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by Brian
08-16-2003 9:33 AM


Re: aramaic holds the key
The gospels were translated into aramaic very early. Probably the most well know of those translations is the Peshitta.
Judge is convinced that the aramaic is the original language of the NT, rather than a translation. His arguments depend upon that primacy of aramaic. Judge and I have been through that debate already.
EvC Forum: What language was Matthew written in?
EvC Forum: Two different fields.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Brian, posted 08-16-2003 9:33 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by Brian, posted 08-16-2003 10:53 AM John has replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 42 of 82 (50796)
08-18-2003 12:11 AM
Reply to: Message 38 by Brian
08-16-2003 10:53 AM


Re: aramaic holds the key
quote:
I will read through the links, many thanks.
Any input would be appreciated. I was quite enjoying that discussion... then it died.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Brian, posted 08-16-2003 10:53 AM Brian has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 82 (51740)
08-22-2003 1:17 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by phil
08-21-2003 10:06 PM


Re: Lineage of Jesus
quote:
"Why not explicity give Mary's lineage instead?" I have answered this several times. . .Mary was a woman and so she was listed under the household of Joseph.
But where is your evidence for this? It isn't enough just to say that is what happened. You need to provide some proof.
quote:
Also, if it is through Joseph, then why does Luke write, "He was the son of Joseph, SO IT WAS THOUGHT. . .?"
Because if Luke says Jesus is the son of Joseph he can't very well be the son of God, so instead he adds the disclaimer. Isn't it obvious?
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by phil, posted 08-21-2003 10:06 PM phil has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 67 of 82 (52072)
08-24-2003 9:21 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by sup32string
08-24-2003 6:55 PM


Re: seed of David
quote:
Can you provide proof that the bible is not a work of half fiction half fact?
Ooh... that is way too kind.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by sup32string, posted 08-24-2003 6:55 PM sup32string has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024