Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 76 (8908 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 05-22-2019 1:14 PM
38 online now:
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WeloTemo
Post Volume:
Total: 851,842 Year: 6,879/19,786 Month: 1,420/1,581 Week: 242/393 Day: 65/110 Hour: 1/14


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Methodological Naturalism is fallacious
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 6130
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 17 of 50 (517797)
08-02-2009 4:57 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by mike the wiz
08-02-2009 4:48 PM


The fallacy is that if God's existence cannot be ascertained, you cannot logically conclude that a special creator is OUT.

It is a non-issue until evidence there is a creator is supplied. Why should I even consider such a thing if there is no evidence for it.

Try this

The fallacy is that if the IPU's existence cannot be ascertained, you logically cannot conclude that the IPU is out.

Think about the underlined part properly.


Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by mike the wiz, posted 08-02-2009 4:48 PM mike the wiz has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by mike the wiz, posted 08-02-2009 5:00 PM Theodoric has responded

    
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 6130
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 21 of 50 (517801)
08-02-2009 5:03 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by mike the wiz
08-02-2009 5:00 PM


How is what I posted any different then what you posted? Provide evidence of this designer. Can you?


Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by mike the wiz, posted 08-02-2009 5:00 PM mike the wiz has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by mike the wiz, posted 08-02-2009 5:12 PM Theodoric has responded

    
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 6130
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 37 of 50 (517822)
08-02-2009 5:41 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by mike the wiz
08-02-2009 5:12 PM


therefore i have no evidence, i have something far greater!

Ok no evidence. Hmm I guess that would make it tough to convince anyone of your argument.

Something greater????

ooo, ooo, I know, I know. Pick Me.

Faith???

What a crock. This is a science forum. Take your evangelism to the faith forums. If you have no evidence you have nothing.


Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by mike the wiz, posted 08-02-2009 5:12 PM mike the wiz has not yet responded

    
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 6130
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 39 of 50 (517824)
08-02-2009 5:46 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by mike the wiz
08-02-2009 5:25 PM


So you have no evidence. No science, no anything.

As this is a Science forum it is incumbent on you to provide evidence. This is not a place to invoke the old godidit canard.

If that is all you have then start another thread in one fo the faith forums.

There is a biblical explanation known as the "curse" or the "fall".

Not science.

No more feeding the troll for me, unless of course he says something even more glaringly stupid.

Edited by Theodoric, : final line


Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by mike the wiz, posted 08-02-2009 5:25 PM mike the wiz has not yet responded

    
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019