3 online now:	PaulK, Tangle, Zucadragon
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/1

EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

Methodological Naturalism is fallacious

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: Methodological Naturalism is fallacious

Theodoric

Member

Posts: 9142

From: Northwest, WI, USA

Joined: 08-15-2005

Member Rating: 3.3

Normal Thread Display

Message 17 of 50 (517797)
08-02-2009 4:57 PM

Reply to: Message 15 by mike the wiz
08-02-2009 4:48 PM

The fallacy is that if God's existence cannot be ascertained, you cannot logically conclude that a special creator is OUT.

It is a non-issue until evidence there is a creator is supplied. Why should I even consider such a thing if there is no evidence for it.

Try this

The fallacy is that if the IPU's existence cannot be ascertained, you logically cannot conclude that the IPU is out.

Think about the underlined part properly.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
	Message 15 by mike the wiz, posted 08-02-2009 4:48 PM		mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 19 by mike the wiz, posted 08-02-2009 5:00 PM		Theodoric has replied

Theodoric

Member

Posts: 9142

From: Northwest, WI, USA

Joined: 08-15-2005

Member Rating: 3.3

Normal Thread Display

Message 21 of 50 (517801)
08-02-2009 5:03 PM

Reply to: Message 19 by mike the wiz
08-02-2009 5:00 PM

How is what I posted any different then what you posted? Provide evidence of this designer. Can you?

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
	Message 19 by mike the wiz, posted 08-02-2009 5:00 PM		mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 23 by mike the wiz, posted 08-02-2009 5:12 PM		Theodoric has replied

Theodoric

Member

Posts: 9142

From: Northwest, WI, USA

Joined: 08-15-2005

Member Rating: 3.3

Normal Thread Display

Message 37 of 50 (517822)
08-02-2009 5:41 PM

Reply to: Message 23 by mike the wiz
08-02-2009 5:12 PM

therefore i have no evidence, i have something far greater!

Ok no evidence. Hmm I guess that would make it tough to convince anyone of your argument.

Something greater????

ooo, ooo, I know, I know. Pick Me.

Faith???

What a crock. This is a science forum. Take your evangelism to the faith forums. If you have no evidence you have nothing.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
	Message 23 by mike the wiz, posted 08-02-2009 5:12 PM		mike the wiz has not replied

Theodoric

Member

Posts: 9142

From: Northwest, WI, USA

Joined: 08-15-2005

Member Rating: 3.3

Normal Thread Display

Message 39 of 50 (517824)
08-02-2009 5:46 PM

Reply to: Message 30 by mike the wiz
08-02-2009 5:25 PM

So you have no evidence. No science, no anything.

As this is a Science forum it is incumbent on you to provide evidence. This is not a place to invoke the old godidit canard.

If that is all you have then start another thread in one fo the faith forums.

There is a biblical explanation known as the "curse" or the "fall".

Not science.

No more feeding the troll for me, unless of course he says something even more glaringly stupid.

Edited by Theodoric, : final line

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
	Message 30 by mike the wiz, posted 08-02-2009 5:25 PM		mike the wiz has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button