Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 78 (8974 total)
176 online now:
PaulK (1 member, 175 visitors)
Newest Member: dad
Post Volume: Total: 875,752 Year: 7,500/23,288 Month: 59/1,347 Week: 76/342 Day: 3/56 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Methodological Naturalism is fallacious
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16111
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 10 of 50 (514487)
07-08-2009 5:55 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by mike the wiz
07-07-2009 6:40 AM


If I insist that a ferrari is designed, and have a theory that it is designed by itself, somehow, and I don't include a designer, strictly - then I must come to a conclusion that is natural - yes.

So you must come to a natural conclusion, about something which might not have been naturally created, LOGICALLY.

You seem not to know what methodological naturalism is.

Obviously, every methodological naturalist would agree that a Ferrari has designers.

On the other hand, a methodological naturalist would be committed to trying to understand how a Ferrari came into being without breaking the laws of nature.

And of course, the methodological naturalist would be right. No miracles were involved in the production of a Ferrari.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by mike the wiz, posted 07-07-2009 6:40 AM mike the wiz has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by mike the wiz, posted 08-02-2009 4:36 PM Dr Adequate has not yet responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16111
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 24 of 50 (517807)
08-02-2009 5:18 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by mike the wiz
08-02-2009 5:12 PM


FStDT ...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by mike the wiz, posted 08-02-2009 5:12 PM mike the wiz has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020