The last sentence of the next to last paragraph, either I don't understand you or it's not really an inherent contradiction. Wouldn't it be that the conclusion doesn't follow from premise or reasoning? What you earlier in the paragraph described as a logical leap?
If it's just that I don't get it then there may be others that also don't get it, so please just edit your post so that the contradiction is explained more clearly. Or if you agree it's not a contradiciton then edit your post in that way. In either case, please post a note to this thread when you're done and I'll take another look.
-- | Percy |
| EvC Forum Director |